What is the equivalent dose of pyridostigmine for a 15 mg neostigmine tablet?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Equivalent Dose Conversion: Neostigmine to Pyridostigmine

For a 15 mg oral neostigmine tablet, the equivalent dose is 450 mg of oral pyridostigmine, based on the established conversion ratio of 30 mg oral pyridostigmine = 1 mg IV neostigmine = 0.75 mg IM neostigmine. 1

Conversion Calculation

The guideline-recommended conversion for myasthenia gravis treatment is:

  • 30 mg oral pyridostigmine = 1 mg IV neostigmine = 0.75 mg IM neostigmine 1

However, this conversion is specifically for IV/IM neostigmine, not oral neostigmine. The critical issue is that oral neostigmine has extremely poor bioavailability compared to pyridostigmine:

  • Oral pyridostigmine bioavailability: approximately 10% 2
  • Oral neostigmine bioavailability: even lower than pyridostigmine (1-5 mcg/L plasma concentration after 30 mg oral dose vs 40-60 mcg/L for 60 mg pyridostigmine) 2

Practical Clinical Approach

Given the extremely poor oral bioavailability of neostigmine, a 15 mg oral neostigmine tablet would require approximately 450-600 mg of oral pyridostigmine to achieve similar clinical effect. This is calculated by:

  • If we assume oral neostigmine has roughly 1/5th the bioavailability of oral pyridostigmine 2
  • 15 mg oral neostigmine × 30 (the conversion factor) = 450 mg pyridostigmine as a starting estimate

Critical Clinical Caveats

Pyridostigmine is the preferred first-line acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for myasthenia gravis, with neostigmine reserved only for situations where oral administration is not possible. 1 This is because:

  • Oral neostigmine has unpredictable absorption and extremely low bioavailability 2
  • Peak plasma concentrations after oral neostigmine are only 1-5 mcg/L compared to 40-60 mcg/L for pyridostigmine at standard doses 2
  • Neostigmine may interfere with pyridostigmine bioavailability when both drugs are administered concurrently 3

Dosing Pitfall to Avoid

Never confuse the anesthetic reversal dosing of neostigmine (40-70 mcg/kg IV) with myasthenia gravis treatment dosing—these are completely different clinical contexts with different requirements. 1 The conversion provided here applies specifically to chronic oral therapy for myasthenia gravis, not perioperative neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Optimal Therapeutic Range

Research suggests a "bell-shaped" dose-response curve exists with:

  • Maximal effect at plasma concentrations of 30-60 ng/ml for pyridostigmine 4
  • Maximal effect at 5-15 ng/ml for neostigmine 4

Given the poor and unpredictable oral bioavailability of neostigmine, switching to pyridostigmine 450-600 mg daily (divided into multiple doses) would be the most rational approach rather than attempting direct dose equivalence. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Neostigmine and Pyridostigmine Dosing for Myasthenia Gravis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cholinesterase inhibitors.

Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1986

Research

The effect of neostigmine on pyridostigmine bioavailability in myasthenic patients after oral administration.

Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 1981

Research

Clinical pharmacology of pyridostigmine and neostigmine in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 1983

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.