What is the recommended screening for osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Osteoporosis Screening Recommendations

Primary Recommendation

All women aged 65 years or older should be screened for osteoporosis using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine. 1, 2, 3


Screening by Population

Women

  • Women ≥65 years: Universal screening with DXA is recommended (Grade B recommendation) 1, 2, 3

  • Women <65 years (postmenopausal): Screen if their 10-year fracture risk equals or exceeds that of a 65-year-old white woman with no additional risk factors (9.3% 10-year fracture risk) 1, 2, 3

    • Use the FRAX tool (available at www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/) to calculate 10-year fracture risk for women aged 50-64 years 1, 2, 3
    • Body weight <70 kg is the single best predictor of low bone mineral density and should trigger screening consideration 3

Men

  • Men ≥70 years: The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends screening, though evidence is more limited than for women 2, 3

  • All men (any age): The USPSTF concludes there is insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of routine screening (Grade I statement) 1

    • However, men most likely to benefit have a 10-year fracture risk equal to or greater than that of a 65-year-old white woman without risk factors 1, 2

Risk Factors That Should Trigger Screening

The following risk factors warrant screening consideration in younger postmenopausal women and men 2, 3:

  • Previous fragility fracture
  • Parental history of hip fracture
  • Low body mass index or body weight <70 kg
  • Current or prolonged glucocorticoid use
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Secondary causes of osteoporosis (hypogonadism, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, malabsorption disorders)
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (≥3 drinks/day)
  • Current cigarette smoking

Screening Method

DXA of the hip and lumbar spine is the gold standard for osteoporosis screening and diagnosis. 1, 2, 4, 3, 5

  • DXA has 90-95% sensitivity for detecting osteoporosis 4
  • Quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus can predict fractures but current diagnostic and treatment criteria rely exclusively on DXA measurements 1, 3
  • The proximal femur (hip) and lumbar spine are the recommended diagnostic sites 4

Screening Intervals

  • Evidence is lacking about optimal intervals for repeated screening 1, 3

  • Practical approach:

    • If initial DXA does not warrant treatment, repeat testing every 2-5 years depending on proximity to treatment thresholds 4
    • A minimum of 2 years is needed to reliably measure a change in bone mineral density due to testing precision limitations 3
    • Patients on bone loss-inducing medications or with baseline BMD near treatment threshold should have DXA every 2 years or more frequently if medically necessary 4

Interpretation of Results

  • Osteoporosis diagnosis: T-score ≤ -2.5 (bone mass ≥2.5 standard deviations below that of young adults) 5, 6
  • Osteopenia: T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 1
  • Normal: T-score ≥ -1.0 1

Treatment decisions should consider absolute fracture risk rather than BMD alone using tools like FRAX 2, 5


Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't rely solely on clinical risk assessment instruments without BMD testing, as they have only modest predictive value for low bone density or fractures 1

  • Don't forget to assess for secondary causes of osteoporosis (present in 32-85% of previously undiagnosed cases), including vitamin D deficiency, hypogonadism in men, and estrogen deficiency in premenopausal women 4

  • Don't screen too frequently: Repeated BMD measurement after 8 years was not more predictive of fracture risk than the original measurement in one study 3

  • Recognize that screening harms are small (primarily false-positive results, patient anxiety, and opportunity costs), making the benefit-to-harm ratio favorable in recommended populations 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Screening Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Diagnostic Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Osteoporosis: A Review.

JAMA, 2025

Research

Osteoporosis: Common Questions and Answers.

American family physician, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.