Is the provided template for determining CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes for new and established patient office visits based on Medical Decision Making (MDM) or total time accurate and comprehensive?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Template Accuracy Assessment: Critical Errors and Outdated Information

Your template contains significant errors and is based on outdated CPT coding guidelines from 2013-2019, not the current 2021+ framework that fundamentally changed MDM criteria and time thresholds.

Major Errors Requiring Immediate Correction

Time Thresholds Are Incorrect

  • 99214 for established patients requires 30-39 minutes, NOT 25 minutes as your template states 1
  • 99204 for new patients requires 45-59 minutes, NOT 45 minutes as your template states 1
  • 99215 for established patients requires 40-54 minutes, NOT 40 minutes as your template states 1
  • 99205 for new patients requires 60-74 minutes, NOT 60 minutes as your template states 1
  • The 2013 guidelines you're referencing used the "more than half spent counseling" rule, which was eliminated in 2021 1

MDM Criteria Are Incomplete and Inaccurate

Problems Addressed Section:

  • Your template omits critical problem categories including "undiagnosed new problem with uncertain prognosis" (moderate complexity) 2
  • Missing specification that problems must be "addressed" during the encounter, not just listed 2
  • Lacks clarity on what constitutes "exacerbation" versus "severe exacerbation" 2

Data Reviewed Section:

  • Category 1 incorrectly lists "Assessment requiring independent historian" as a Cat 1 item—this is actually Category 2 2
  • Missing critical Cat 1 items: "Review of prior external note from each unique source" and "Review each unique test result" (these are separate items) 2
  • Category 2 should include "Independent interpretation of tests" NOT just "independent interpretation" 2
  • Category 3 requires "Discussion of management or test interpretation with external physician/appropriate source" with specific documentation requirements 2
  • For high complexity (99205/99215), you state "meets requirements for TWO of the three data categories"—this is imprecise. The actual requirement is meeting specific point thresholds across categories 2

Risk of Management Section:

  • Your risk categories are oversimplified and lack the nuanced table of risk from CPT guidelines 2
  • "Decision for minor surgery" is moderate risk, but your template doesn't specify what qualifies as "minor" versus "major" 2
  • Missing critical risk elements like "drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity" (moderate risk) 2

MDM Level Determination Logic Is Wrong

  • Your template doesn't explain that only 2 of 3 MDM elements (Problems, Data, Risk) need to be met at a given level to qualify for that level 2
  • This is the fundamental rule: if 2 out of 3 elements meet "moderate complexity," the overall MDM is moderate 2
  • Your template lists all three elements but doesn't clarify this "2 of 3" rule explicitly in the billing section 2

Missing Critical Components

Time Calculation Is Fundamentally Flawed

  • Your "Total Time for Billing: [Total Minutes Elapsed] + 10 minutes" formula is completely incorrect and has no basis in CPT guidelines 1
  • Total time is simply the time spent on the date of encounter, period—no arbitrary additions 1
  • Your list of "encounter activities included" is generic and doesn't specify that time must be spent on activities "on the date of the encounter" 1

Modifier 25 Guidance Missing

  • Your template completely omits guidance on when to use Modifier 25, which is critical when billing E/M services on the same day as procedures or preventive care 3
  • Modifier 25 must be appended to the E/M code when a separately identifiable E/M service is performed on the same day as a procedure 3

Preventive Care vs. Problem-Oriented Visit Confusion

  • Your template doesn't address the common scenario where a preventive care visit (99381-99394) transitions to a problem-oriented visit requiring separate E/M coding 3
  • This is a major billing pitfall: using standard office visit codes for routine wellness care when dedicated preventive care codes exist 3

Prolonged Services Codes Missing

  • Your template omits CPT codes 99354-99355 for prolonged face-to-face services and 99358-99359 for non-face-to-face prolonged services 1
  • These are critical add-on codes when visits exceed typical time thresholds significantly 1

Documentation Requirements Not Specified

  • Your template doesn't specify what documentation is required to support each MDM level 2
  • For moderate complexity, detailed interval history is required 2
  • For time-based billing, total time must be explicitly documented in the visit note 2
  • For telehealth, additional documentation includes patient consent, method, locations, and participants 2

Billing Logic Section Is Problematic

  • Your instruction to "compare the two CPT codes and generate ONLY the section that results in the higher reimbursement level" is clinically inappropriate 2
  • Billing should be based on what was actually done and documented, not on maximizing reimbursement 2
  • The correct approach: calculate both MDM-based and time-based codes, then bill based on whichever is supported by documentation, not whichever pays more 2

Specific Corrections Needed

For 99202 (Straightforward MDM):

  • Time threshold: 15-29 minutes (your template omits this) 1

For 99203 (Low Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 30-44 minutes (your template omits this) 1
  • Data requirements need clarification: "Limited" data means reviewing/ordering tests from a single unique source 2

For 99204 (Moderate Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 45-59 minutes (not "at least 45 min") 1
  • Problems: Should specify "1+ chronic illness with exacerbation, progression, or side effects of treatment" 2

For 99205 (High Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 60-74 minutes (not "60 min") 1
  • Data: Requires "Extensive" data, which means 3 points from Category 1 OR 2 points from Category 2 2

For 99212 (Straightforward MDM):

  • Time threshold: 10-19 minutes (your template omits this) 1

For 99213 (Low Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 20-29 minutes (your template omits this) 1

For 99214 (Moderate Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 30-39 minutes (NOT 25 minutes as stated in your template) 1

For 99215 (High Complexity MDM):

  • Time threshold: 40-54 minutes (NOT 40 minutes as stated in your template) 1

Common Pitfalls Your Template Perpetuates

  • Using outdated 2013 time thresholds instead of current 2021+ guidelines 1
  • Failing to document the "2 of 3" MDM rule explicitly 2
  • Not addressing same-day admission scenarios where clinic visit documentation rolls into initial hospital care 4
  • Omitting guidance on when face-to-face encounter is required versus when it's not 4
  • Not specifying that undercoding is common (occurs in 50-80% of visits) when medical decision-making and total problems addressed are not fully documented 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Requirements for Billing an Established Level 4 Visit

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Preventive Care Billing Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Medical decision making: guide to improved CPT coding.

Southern medical journal, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.