Is CPT code 37215 medically necessary for a patient with <50% right carotid artery stenosis and recent stroke?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Carotid Artery Stenting is NOT Medically Necessary for <50% Stenosis

CPT code 37215 (carotid artery stenting) is NOT medically necessary for this patient with right carotid stenosis <50%, regardless of recent stroke symptoms. This represents a Class III recommendation (no benefit) with Level A evidence from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. 1, 2

Clear Guideline Threshold Not Met

The evidence-based threshold for carotid revascularization requires:

  • Symptomatic patients: ≥50% stenosis for consideration, with strongest benefit at ≥70% stenosis 3
  • This patient has <50% stenosis, which falls below the minimum threshold where any revascularization procedure (CEA or CAS) provides benefit 3, 1

The 2011 AHA/ASA guidelines explicitly state: "When degree of stenosis is <50%, there is no indication for CEA" (Class III, Level A). 3 This same recommendation applies to carotid artery stenting. 1, 2

Risk-Benefit Analysis Strongly Against Intervention

The procedural risks exceed any potential benefit:

  • Carotid stenting carries a 4-6% periprocedural stroke/death rate even in experienced hands 3, 1
  • Historical trials (NASCET, ECST) demonstrated no benefit from revascularization when stenosis is <50%, as procedural risks outweigh natural history risk 1
  • The patient would be exposed to unnecessary harm without evidence of benefit 1, 2

Alternative Stroke Etiology Must Be Investigated

The <50% carotid stenosis is unlikely to be the culprit lesion for this patient's stroke. 1, 2

The American Heart Association recommends comprehensive evaluation for other stroke mechanisms, including:

  • Cardiac sources (despite normal TTE, consider TEE for atrial sources, PFO) 1
  • Aortic arch atheroma 1
  • Small vessel disease (given punctate parietal infarct on MRI) 4
  • Other embolic sources 1, 2

Appropriate Management Strategy

Optimal medical therapy is the only evidence-based treatment for carotid stenosis <50%: 1, 2

  1. High-intensity statin therapy initiated immediately, irrespective of baseline lipid levels 1, 2
  2. Antiplatelet therapy: Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) for 21 days post-stroke, then single agent long-term 2
  3. Aggressive blood pressure control: Target <140/90 mmHg (or <130/80 mmHg if tolerated) 1
  4. Risk factor modification: Smoking cessation, diabetes management (current glucose 103 mg/dL) 2
  5. Surveillance imaging: Duplex ultrasound at 6-12 month intervals to monitor for progression 1, 2

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not proceed with carotid stenting based solely on the presence of ipsilateral carotid stenosis when the degree is <50%. 1 The American Stroke Association explicitly advises against this practice, as it exposes patients to procedural risks (4-6% stroke/death rate) without evidence of benefit. 1

The clinical policy bulletin criterion requiring "symptomatic individuals with at least 50% stenosis" is NOT MET in this case. 3, 1

References

Guideline

Carotid Stenosis Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Less Than 50% Stenosis of the Left Internal Carotid Artery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.