How are celiac disease Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels interpreted?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Interpretation of Celiac Disease IgA and IgG Antibody Levels

IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) is the preferred first-line test for celiac disease screening, with sensitivity of 90.7% and specificity of 87.4% in adults at 15 U/mL threshold, while IgG-based tests are primarily reserved for patients with confirmed IgA deficiency. 1, 2

Initial Testing Strategy

IgA-Based Testing (Standard Approach)

  • Always measure total IgA level simultaneously with tTG-IgA to rule out IgA deficiency, which occurs in 1-3% of celiac disease patients and causes falsely negative IgA-based results 3, 2
  • tTG-IgA interpretation thresholds:
    • Levels >10× upper limit of normal have virtually 100% positive predictive value for celiac disease and correlate strongly with severe intestinal damage 3, 2
    • Levels of 21-118 U combined with IgA endomysial antibody (EMA) titer ≥1:160 have 83% positive predictive value 4
    • Levels <20 U combined with EMA titer <1:10 have 92% negative predictive value 4
  • IgA EMA serves as confirmatory testing with excellent specificity of 99.6% in adults and should be performed when tTG-IgA is elevated 1, 3

IgG-Based Testing (Special Populations Only)

  • IgG tests are NOT useful when total IgA is normal - a negative tTG-IgA effectively excludes celiac disease in most cases when IgA levels are adequate 3
  • IgG deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP-IgG) is the preferred IgG test in IgA-deficient patients, with superior diagnostic accuracy (93.6% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity) compared to tTG-IgG 3
  • IgG tTG has limited utility: sensitivity ranges from only 40.6-84.6% and specificity 78.0-89.0%, making it less reliable than DGP-IgG 1

Algorithmic Interpretation Based on Results

Scenario 1: Elevated tTG-IgA with Normal Total IgA

  • If tTG-IgA >10× upper limit of normal: Proceed directly to upper endoscopy with at least 6 duodenal biopsies for confirmation 3, 2
  • If tTG-IgA 1-10× upper limit of normal: Add IgA EMA testing for confirmation before proceeding to biopsy 3, 2
  • Ensure patient is consuming adequate gluten (at least 10g daily for 6-8 weeks) before biopsy to avoid false-negative results 3, 2

Scenario 2: Normal tTG-IgA with Normal Total IgA

  • Celiac disease is effectively ruled out in most cases - consider alternative diagnoses 3
  • Exception: In high-risk populations (first-degree relatives with celiac disease, type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroid disease), consider biopsy despite negative serology if clinical suspicion remains high 3

Scenario 3: IgA Deficiency Confirmed (Low Total IgA)

  • Immediately switch to IgG-based testing: Order IgG DGP and IgG tTG 3, 2
  • Do not rely on tTG-IgA results in IgA-deficient patients as they will be falsely negative 5
  • IgG-tTG shows 100% concordance with IgG-EMA in IgA-deficient subjects and can discriminate between positive and negative cases effectively 5

Scenario 4: Discordant Results (Positive tTG-IgA, Negative EMA)

  • Proceed with upper endoscopy and biopsy as the gold standard - discordant results may represent early or developing celiac disease 3
  • tTG-IgA has higher sensitivity but lower specificity than EMA, so positive tTG-IgA with negative EMA requires histologic confirmation 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never start a gluten-free diet before completing diagnostic workup - this leads to false-negative serology and inconclusive biopsies 3, 2
  • Never rely solely on serology without biopsy confirmation in adults - biopsy remains the gold standard except in specific pediatric protocols 3, 2
  • Do not order IgG tests when IgA levels are normal - this adds no diagnostic value and increases false positives 3
  • Do not interpret isolated positive IgG tTG as diagnostic when IgA is normal - this has poor specificity and requires alternative diagnosis consideration 3

Monitoring After Diagnosis

  • Follow-up tTG-IgA testing schedule: at 6 months after starting gluten-free diet, at 12 months, then annually thereafter 3, 6
  • Persistently elevated antibodies indicate ongoing gluten exposure or poor dietary compliance 3, 6
  • Antibody levels typically decline within months of starting gluten-free diet, with most significant drops in the first year 3
  • Negative serology after treatment does not guarantee mucosal healing - consider follow-up biopsy in 1-3 years for severe initial presentations 3, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Celiac Disease Diagnostic Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluating Discordant Celiac Disease Test Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnosis of celiac disease in adults based on serology test results, without small-bowel biopsy.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2013

Guideline

Celiac Disease Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.