What are the risks of a low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risks of Low Fetal Fraction in Cell-Free DNA Testing

Women with low fetal fraction cfDNA results face a significantly increased risk of fetal aneuploidy (odds ratio 9.2), particularly trisomies 13,18, and triploidy, and should be offered diagnostic testing with amniocentesis or CVS. 1

Primary Risk: Increased Aneuploidy Risk

Low fetal fraction is strongly associated with fetal chromosomal abnormalities:

  • Test failure occurs in 8% of all patients overall, but this rate doubles to 16% in pregnancies with fetal aneuploidy 1
  • The odds ratio for aneuploidy in cases with failed tests due to low fetal fraction is 9.2 1
  • Trisomies 13 and 18, as well as triploidy, are particularly associated with low fetal fraction results 1, 2

Secondary Risk: Test Failure and Delayed Diagnosis

Low fetal fraction results in test failure in 0.9-8.1% of cases, potentially delaying critical diagnostic information:

  • Repeat testing is successful in only 50-80% of cases 1
  • At advanced gestational ages, patients may not wish to delay obtaining definitive information given the increased aneuploidy risk 1
  • The test failure rate varies depending on whether laboratories measure fetal fraction and require minimum concentrations 1

Associated Maternal and Pregnancy Factors

Low fetal fraction is associated with specific maternal characteristics that affect test reliability:

Maternal Obesity

  • cfDNA screening fails to provide results in 20% of women >250 lb and 50% of women >350 lb 1, 3
  • Maternal high BMI is the strongest predictor of low fetal fraction 3, 4
  • In obese or morbidly obese women, cfDNA screening may not be the best screening option 1

Gestational Age

  • Fetal fraction is lower at <10 weeks gestation and less likely to provide a result 1, 3
  • Fetal fraction remains relatively constant from 10-22 weeks of gestation 1

Multiple Gestations

  • Higher failure rates occur in multifetal gestations 1, 3
  • Vanishing twin or empty second gestational sac is associated with false-positive results 1, 2
  • Detection rates may be lower in twin pregnancies, though data are limited 1

Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Emerging evidence suggests low fetal fraction may indicate abnormal placentation and predict pregnancy complications:

  • Low fetal fraction is associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, small for gestational age neonates, and preterm birth 5
  • Inverse correlation exists between fetal fraction and mean arterial pressure and uterine artery pulsatility index 6
  • Lower fetal fraction correlates with higher risks for preeclampsia <34 weeks, preeclampsia <37 weeks, and fetal growth restriction <37 weeks 6

Important Caveats

Not all low fetal fraction results indicate increased risk:

  • One large study of >1,100 patients with low fetal fraction showed no enrichment of aneuploidy upon redraw (84.2% yielded reportable results) 7
  • In this cohort, almost all pregnancies with repeated low fetal fraction failure resulted in apparently healthy liveborns 7
  • This suggests that proceeding directly to diagnostic testing may be unwarranted for most patients, and redrawing may be appropriate 7

However, the ACOG guideline recommendation remains that diagnostic testing should be offered given the overall increased risk 1, 3, particularly because the association with trisomies 13,18, and triploidy is well-established across multiple studies.

Clinical Management Algorithm

For patients with low fetal fraction results:

  1. Counsel about 9.2-fold increased odds of aneuploidy, particularly trisomies 13,18, and triploidy 1
  2. Offer diagnostic testing (amniocentesis or CVS) as the primary option 1, 3
  3. Consider repeat cfDNA testing as an alternative, understanding 50-80% success rate 1
  4. Factor in gestational age when deciding between repeat testing versus proceeding directly to diagnostic testing 1
  5. Consider maternal weight and whether alternative screening methods would be more appropriate 1, 3

1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Complex Aneuploidy in Embryos

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Factors Associated with Low Fetal Fraction in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Association between fetal fraction on cell-free DNA testing and first-trimester markers for pre-eclampsia.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.