What is the recommended method for performing quantitative immunoglobulin (Ig) measurements?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Quantitative Immunoglobulin Measurement Methods

Recommended Laboratory Technique

Quantitative immunoglobulin measurements should be performed using nephelometry or turbidimetry, which are the standard automated methods for measuring IgG, IgA, and IgM levels in serum. 1

Primary Measurement Approach

Nephelometry and Turbidimetry

  • These automated immunochemical methods are the gold standard for quantitative immunoglobulin measurement, providing rapid, precise, and reliable results 1, 2
  • Nephelometry can be used in place of serum protein electrophoresis when certain immunoglobulins (such as IgA) are difficult to quantify 1
  • Turbidimetric methods using centrifugal analyzers provide excellent precision with day-to-day coefficients of variation ranging from 2.5% to 5.2% 3
  • These methods can measure wide concentration ranges: IgG from 0.1-24 g/L, and IgA/IgM from 50-4000 mg/L 3

Technical Specifications

  • Polyethylene glycol should be added to enhance antigen-antibody reactions and improve sensitivity 3, 4
  • Turbidimetric endpoint readings are typically taken at 340 nm, with timing at 4 minutes for IgG and 12 minutes for IgA and IgM 3
  • Kinetic turbidimetric approaches allow quantification across all regions of the immunoprecipitin curve, including samples with antigen excess 4
  • Both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies can be used, though polyclonal antisera remain standard 2

Complementary Testing Required

Essential Concurrent Tests

  • Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation must be performed to distinguish monoclonal from polyclonal elevations 1, 5
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay with kappa/lambda ratio should be measured to detect light chain abnormalities 1, 5
  • The same FLC assay must be used consistently for monitoring individual patients, as different assays (FreeLite vs N Latex) are mathematically inconvertible 1

Urine Studies

  • 24-hour urine collection with urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) is necessary for complete assessment, as it provides total protein, albumin, and monoclonal component levels 1, 5
  • Urine immunofixation should be performed on concentrated 24-hour urine specimens 1
  • Urinary light chain assays have not been validated and should not be used to quantify Bence Jones protein 1

Critical Technical Considerations

Sample Requirements

  • Serum samples are preferred over plasma for immunoglobulin quantification 6
  • All measurements should be performed in duplicate to account for coefficient of variation 1
  • Testing should be completed within appropriate timeframes after sample collection to ensure stability

Quality Control

  • Each laboratory must establish local reference ranges using at least 50-100 healthy individuals, predominantly women 1
  • Cut-off values should be calculated using percentile methods rather than standard deviations, as immunoglobulin distributions are non-Gaussian 1
  • The 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentiles should be documented 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Interpretation Errors

  • Do not rely solely on quantitative immunoglobulin levels without SPEP/immunofixation, as this will miss monoclonal gammopathies that require different management 5
  • Renal impairment significantly affects free light chain ratios: the normal ratio of 0.26-1.65 can rise to 0.34-3.10 in severe renal impairment (CKD stage 5) 1
  • Mildly lipemic sera can be tested without correction when using automated turbidimetric methods 7

Monitoring Considerations

  • The same assay platform must be used for serial monitoring of individual patients, particularly for free light chains 1
  • If initial results are negative but clinical suspicion remains high, consider checking with an alternative assay platform 1
  • In diseases with intact monoclonal immunoglobulins (such as PGNMID), serum immunofixation may be more helpful than free light chain assays 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Elevated Immunoglobulin Levels

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Quantitative serum immunoglobulin tests.

Australian family physician, 2013

Research

An automated turbidimetric rate method for immunoglobulin assays.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 1978

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.