What labs are recommended for erythema multiforme?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Laboratory Testing for Erythema Multiforme

The diagnosis of erythema multiforme is primarily clinical, based on characteristic target lesions and history; routine laboratory testing is generally not required or recommended for diagnosis, but specific tests may be indicated to identify the underlying trigger or exclude alternative diagnoses. 1, 2, 3

Core Diagnostic Approach

Erythema multiforme is diagnosed clinically through recognition of typical targetoid lesions with acral distribution and histopathologic confirmation when needed—not through laboratory panels. 1, 2 The key is identifying the underlying cause rather than confirming the diagnosis itself through labs. 4

Trigger Identification Testing

When HSV is Suspected (Most Common Cause)

  • HSV serology or PCR from active lesions if herpes simplex virus-associated EM is suspected, particularly in recurrent cases 1, 2
  • This is the single most important test since HSV is the most common identifiable trigger 1, 4

When Mycoplasma pneumoniae is Suspected (Especially in Children)

  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae serology if respiratory symptoms are present or in pediatric cases 1, 2
  • Consider chest X-ray if pulmonary symptoms exist 1

When Other Infectious Triggers are Suspected

  • Hepatitis C serology in appropriate clinical context 1
  • Epstein-Barr virus serology if mononucleosis-like symptoms present 1
  • Coxsackie virus testing in pediatric cases with appropriate clinical features 1

Exclusion of Alternative Diagnoses

When Immunobullous Disease is in the Differential

  • Skin biopsy for routine histopathology from lesional skin adjacent to a blister 5, 3
  • Direct immunofluorescence from perilesional skin to exclude pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA disease, and paraneoplastic pemphigus 5, 3, 6

When Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/TEN is Considered

  • Complete blood count to assess for cytopenias 5
  • Comprehensive metabolic panel including liver function tests, renal function, and electrolytes 5
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein 5
  • Chest X-ray 5
  • Coagulation studies if severe disease 5

Critical distinction: SJS/TEN presents with widespread erythematous or purpuric macules with blisters and epidermal detachment, whereas EM shows fixed target lesions for minimum 7 days. 5, 2

Baseline Assessment for Severe Mucosal Involvement

When hospitalization is required for severe mucosal disease:

  • Electrolytes and renal function to assess hydration status and guide fluid replacement 2, 3
  • Complete blood count as baseline 5
  • Bacterial cultures from erosions if secondary infection suspected 5

Tests NOT Routinely Indicated

  • Autoimmune panels (ANA, complement levels, anti-dsDNA) are not indicated for EM diagnosis unless systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune disease is specifically suspected 5, 7
  • Routine inflammatory markers without specific indication 2
  • Extensive infectious disease workup without clinical suspicion of specific pathogens 1

Common Pitfalls

Do not confuse EM with urticaria: Individual EM lesions remain fixed for ≥7 days, while urticarial lesions resolve within 24 hours—this is a clinical distinction, not a laboratory one. 2

Do not order extensive autoimmune panels reflexively: The evidence provided on SLE monitoring 5, 7, 8, 9 and eosinophilia workup 5 is not applicable to EM, which is an immune-mediated reaction pattern, not an autoimmune disease. 1, 4

Biopsy is confirmatory, not diagnostic: Histopathology shows interface dermatitis with keratinocyte necrosis, but the diagnosis remains primarily clinical based on the characteristic target lesions. 3, 6

References

Research

Current Perspectives on Erythema Multiforme.

Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2018

Research

Erythema Multiforme: Recognition and Management.

American family physician, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Oral manifestations of erythema multiforme.

Dermatologic clinics, 2003

Guideline

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Suspected SLE Flare with Systemic Manifestations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Anti-Histone Antibody Testing in Suspected Lupus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.