Staging Investigations for Breast Cancer
For early-stage breast cancer (Stage I-II with ≤3 positive nodes), routine distant metastasis staging with CT scans and bone scans is not recommended, as these patients should only undergo clinical examination, laboratory tests, and bilateral breast imaging. 1
Essential Baseline Workup for All Patients
All newly diagnosed breast cancer patients require the following core investigations:
- Complete history and physical examination including assessment of menopausal status, family history, and clinical signs of metastatic disease 1
- Laboratory tests including complete blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, alkaline phosphatase, and calcium levels 1
- Bilateral mammography and ultrasound of both breasts and regional lymph nodes 1
- Core needle biopsy (ultrasound or stereotactic-guided preferred) to confirm invasive disease and obtain tissue for biomarker analysis 1, 2
- Biomarker assessment from biopsy specimen including ER, PR, HER2 status, and Ki67 proliferation index 1, 2
Risk-Stratified Approach to Distant Metastasis Staging
The key to appropriate staging is risk stratification based on clinical and pathological features:
Low-Risk Patients (No Distant Staging Required)
- Stage I disease 1
- Stage II with ≤3 positive lymph nodes 1
- Asymptomatic patients without laboratory abnormalities 3
For these patients, routine chest CT, abdominal imaging, and bone scans provide no survival benefit and should be avoided 1.
High-Risk Patients (Full Distant Staging Indicated)
Distant metastasis staging is recommended for patients with:
- Large tumors (≥5 cm) 3, 1
- Clinically positive axillary nodes or ≥4 positive nodes 3, 1
- Stage III disease 1
- Clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggesting metastases 3, 1
For high-risk patients, the minimum staging workup includes:
Role of PET-CT in Staging
PET-CT should NOT be used for routine staging of early breast cancer due to high false-negative rates for small lesions (<1 cm) and poor sensitivity for axillary nodes 1.
PET-CT may be considered only in specific circumstances:
- When conventional imaging is inconclusive 3, 1
- Locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer in patients being considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy 1
- As an alternative to CT plus bone scan in metastatic disease staging 3
The evidence shows PET-CT has limited specificity compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy for locoregional staging 3.
Metastatic Disease Staging
For patients with confirmed or suspected metastatic breast cancer, a different approach applies:
- Biopsy of metastatic lesion to confirm diagnosis and reassess tumor biology (ER, PR, HER2) 3
- Minimum imaging includes CT chest and abdomen plus bone scintigraphy 3
- PET-CT may replace CT and bone scans in the metastatic setting 3
- Brain imaging for symptomatic patients or when CNS metastases would alter treatment choice 3
Additional Specialized Assessments
Cardiac Function
Cardiac ultrasound or MUGA scan is mandatory before starting anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab therapy 1.
Genetic Testing
BRCA1/BRCA2 testing should be offered to patients with:
- Strong family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or high-grade prostate cancer 1
- Personal history of ovarian cancer, second breast cancer, or male breast cancer 1
- HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (for treatment selection) 3
Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Disease
For patients with metastatic disease, additional biomarkers guide treatment:
- PIK3CA mutation status in ER-positive/HER2-negative disease 3
- PD-L1 status in triple-negative breast cancer 3
- Germline BRCA mutations in HER2-negative metastatic disease 3
Postoperative Pathological Assessment
The surgical specimen must be evaluated according to the pTNM system including:
- Number, location, and maximum diameter of tumors 3, 1
- Total number of removed and positive lymph nodes with extent of metastases (isolated tumor cells, micrometastases, or macrometastases) 3, 1
- Histological type and grade according to WHO classification 3, 2
- Confirmation of biomarker analysis (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67) 3, 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Over-staging early disease: Intensive surveillance imaging in asymptomatic Stage I patients provides no survival benefit 1
- Routine use of PET-CT: This leads to high false-positive rates and unnecessary interventions in early-stage disease 1
- Incomplete biomarker testing: If ER/PR and HER2 are negative in biopsy, retest in surgical specimen to account for tumor heterogeneity 3
- Using different imaging modalities for monitoring: The baseline imaging modality should be consistently applied for disease monitoring to ensure comparability 3