What is the significance of the Gleason score in determining the treatment plan for prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Gleason Score Significance in Prostate Cancer Treatment Planning

The Gleason score is the single most critical histopathologic factor that determines prostate cancer treatment strategy, directly dictating whether a patient receives active surveillance, definitive local therapy, or aggressive multimodal treatment based on risk stratification. 1, 2

How the Gleason Score Works

The Gleason score ranges from 6 to 10 and is calculated by adding the two most common cancer patterns observed on biopsy, with each pattern graded 1-5 by the pathologist. 1 Higher scores indicate more aggressive, poorly differentiated cancer cells that grow rapidly and carry worse prognosis. 1, 2

The modern Grade Group system simplifies interpretation: 2

  • Grade Group 1 (Gleason ≤6): Well-formed individual glands only
  • Grade Group 2 (Gleason 3+4=7): Predominantly well-formed glands
  • Grade Group 3 (Gleason 4+3=7): Predominantly poorly-formed glands
  • Grade Group 4 (Gleason 8): Only poorly-formed/fused glands
  • Grade Group 5 (Gleason 9-10): No gland formation, often with necrosis

Risk Stratification Determines Treatment

The Gleason score combines with PSA level and clinical stage to assign risk categories that directly determine treatment options: 1, 2

Very Low Risk (Gleason ≤6, PSA <10, <3 cores positive)

  • Life expectancy <20 years: Observation is appropriate 1
  • Life expectancy ≥20 years: Definitive treatment recommended 1
  • 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after surgery: 96% 2

Low Risk (Gleason ≤6, PSA <10)

  • Life expectancy <10 years: Observation acceptable 1
  • Life expectancy ≥10 years: Choose between active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, or radiation therapy 1
  • 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality on active surveillance: only 2.4% 2

Intermediate Risk (Gleason 7)

This is where the 3+4 versus 4+3 distinction becomes critical: 2, 3

  • Favorable (Gleason 3+4=7): 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 88% after surgery 2
  • Unfavorable (Gleason 4+3=7): 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival drops to 63% 2
  • Life expectancy <10 years: Observation or treatment options 1
  • Life expectancy ≥10 years: Definitive treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, with or without 4-6 months of hormone therapy 1

The predominant pattern matters significantly—Gleason 4+3 behaves more aggressively than 3+4 despite both totaling 7. 3, 4

High Risk (Gleason 8-10)

These patients require aggressive treatment: 1, 3

  • Life expectancy <5 years: Observation only 1
  • Life expectancy ≥5 years: Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection OR radiation therapy with 2-3 years of androgen deprivation therapy 1, 3
  • 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after surgery:
    • Grade Group 4 (Gleason 8): 48% 2
    • Grade Group 5 (Gleason 9-10): 26% 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Upgrading between biopsy and final pathology is extremely common. 5 Studies show that 65% of Gleason 6 on biopsy upgrades to Gleason 7a at prostatectomy, and 19% upgrades to Gleason 7b. 5 This means biopsy Gleason scores underestimate true disease severity in the majority of cases.

Extensive core involvement is an unfavorable risk factor. 3 A patient with 12 out of 18 positive cores, even with Gleason 3+4, should be considered for aggressive treatment rather than active surveillance due to high-volume disease. 3

Tertiary patterns matter. 2 Tumors with a tertiary Gleason grade 4 or 5 behave more aggressively than the sum of the two dominant patterns alone, even if not reflected in the final score. 2

Post-Treatment Monitoring

After radical prostatectomy, PSA should fall below detectable levels within 2 months. 3 Regular PSA monitoring is essential to detect biochemical recurrence early. 3 Adverse pathological features (positive margins, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension) warrant consideration of adjuvant radiation therapy or androgen deprivation therapy. 3

Gleason score 10 disease represents the most aggressive end of the spectrum (only 0.49% of cases), typically presents with either very low (<20 μg/L) or very high (>70 μg/L) PSA levels, and carries 5-year cancer-specific survival of only 66.7% despite aggressive treatment. 6

References

Guideline

Gleason Score and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Based on Gleason Score

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Prostate Cancer with High-Risk Features

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.