Best Imaging for Persistent Headache in Pregnancy
MRI of the brain without IV contrast is the preferred initial imaging modality for pregnant patients with persistent headache requiring neuroimaging. 1, 2, 3
When Imaging is Actually Indicated
Not all persistent headaches in pregnancy require imaging. The decision to image should be based on specific clinical features:
High-Risk Features Requiring Imaging:
- Severe pain intensity with reduced level of consciousness or seizures—these features significantly increase the likelihood of pathological findings 4
- First trimester presentation with acute severe headache carries statistically higher risk for symptomatic pathology (p = 0.024) 4
- Late pregnancy or peripartum timing—secondary causes become more likely and must be excluded 2, 3
- New neurological deficits on examination 1, 3
- Visual disturbances accompanying the headache 5
- Change in headache pattern from baseline, particularly if progressively worsening or showing new characteristics 6
When Imaging May Not Be Necessary:
- Primary headaches in early pregnancy (migraine, tension-type) with normal neurological examination can typically be diagnosed and treated without imaging 2, 3
- The rate of serious intracranial abnormalities in patients with chronic headache and normal neurological examination is only 0.5%, comparable to incidental findings in asymptomatic volunteers 6
Recommended Imaging Protocol
First-Line Imaging:
- MRI brain without IV contrast is the standard initial study 1, 2, 3
- Add MR venography (MRV) without contrast if venous sinus thrombosis is suspected—this is particularly important in pregnancy given the increased thrombotic risk 2, 4
- In one series, 53.9% of pregnant patients received MRI with venography, and 31.6% received both venography and arteriography 4
When to Add Vascular Imaging:
- MR angiography (MRA) head without contrast should be added when arterial pathology is suspected, including:
Contrast Considerations:
- Avoid gadolinium contrast unless absolutely necessary for diagnosis 1, 3
- If contrast is required, use only when the diagnostic benefit clearly outweighs potential fetal risks 1
Alternative Imaging When MRI Unavailable
- CT head without contrast may be used when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, but should be avoided when possible due to radiation exposure 1
- CT is acceptable for emergent evaluation of suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage or acute intracranial hemorrhage 1
Pregnancy-Specific Diagnostic Considerations
The differential diagnosis in pregnancy includes unique pathologies that must be considered:
Pregnancy-Related Causes:
- Preeclampsia/eclampsia—must be evaluated in late pregnancy presentations 1, 2
- Cerebral venous thrombosis—physiologic changes in pregnancy increase this risk 1, 2
- PRES and RCVS—considerable overlap exists between these conditions 2
- Pituitary apoplexy—pregnancy increases risk 1
Other Secondary Causes:
- Mass lesions (neoplastic or inflammatory) can enlarge late in pregnancy 2, 3
- Carbon monoxide toxicity—maintain high index of suspicion 1
Expected Diagnostic Yield
- 27.6% of pregnant patients who undergo brain imaging have symptomatic pathological findings 4
- In one series, 2 of 60 patients (3.3%) had neurologic emergencies requiring immediate intervention (thalamic hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage) 5
- 96% of imaged patients delivered in the third trimester without significant complications, indicating good overall obstetrical outcomes 5
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay imaging when high-risk features are present—symptomatic pathology is found in over 25% of cases 4
- Do not use CT as first-line unless MRI is unavailable or there is concern for acute hemorrhage requiring emergent diagnosis 1, 3
- Do not routinely use contrast agents—reserve for cases where non-contrast imaging is non-diagnostic and additional information is critical 1, 3
- Do not assume primary headache in late pregnancy or peripartum period without excluding secondary causes 2, 3