Posaconazole Urine Concentration
Posaconazole urine concentrations are not clinically relevant for therapeutic monitoring—plasma trough concentrations are the standard for assessing therapeutic effectiveness.
Why Urine Concentrations Are Not Measured
Posaconazole undergoes minimal renal elimination, with less than 1% of the drug excreted unchanged in urine 1, 2. The renal clearance is negligible (less than 1 mL/h) compared to the mean total oral clearance of 16.3 L/h 1. Because posaconazole is primarily eliminated through fecal excretion (approximately 66-77% of the dose as unchanged drug) and undergoes phase 2 glucuronidation rather than significant renal excretion, urine concentrations do not reflect therapeutic drug exposure 2.
Correct Monitoring Approach: Plasma Trough Concentrations
Therapeutic drug monitoring should measure plasma (serum) trough concentrations, not urine levels 3.
Target Plasma Concentrations
For Prophylaxis:
- Target: >0.7 mg/L (or ≥0.7 µg/mL) for posaconazole suspension 3
- Some evidence suggests concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/L may be effective 3
- With delayed-release tablets or IV formulations, TDM may not be necessary as 300 mg/day achieves ≥0.5 mg/L in >95% of patients 3
For Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections:
- Target: >1.0 mg/L (or ≥1.0 µg/mL) for suspected or documented invasive aspergillosis 3
- Higher concentrations may be needed based on pathogen MICs and resistance concerns 3
Upper Safety Limit:
- Posaconazole exposures between 0.5-3.75 mg/L are well-studied and considered safe 3
- Plasma levels above 3.75 mg/L may be associated with toxicity 3
Timing of Monitoring
- Measure plasma trough levels on day 5 of therapy or soon thereafter 3
- Repeat measurements as clinically indicated, particularly with:
Clinical Pitfalls
Gastrointestinal disorders significantly reduce posaconazole absorption, particularly with the oral suspension formulation 4. Low plasma concentrations are significantly more frequent in patients with diarrhea (71% vs 27%, P=0.009) or mucositis (100% vs 33%, P=0.004) 4. These patients require more frequent monitoring and potentially higher doses or formulation changes 3.
Formulation matters: The delayed-release tablet and IV formulations have superior and more predictable bioavailability compared to the oral suspension 3. If therapeutic levels cannot be achieved with oral suspension, switch to tablet or IV formulation 3.