What exam findings are consistent with Eustachian (auditory tube) tube dysfunction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Exam Findings Consistent with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

Pneumatic otoscopy showing reduced or absent tympanic membrane mobility is the gold standard physical exam finding for ETD, with 94% sensitivity and 80% specificity when performed correctly. 1, 2

Primary Otoscopic Findings

Tympanic Membrane Appearance and Mobility

  • Reduced or absent tympanic membrane mobility on pneumatic otoscopy is the hallmark finding, indicating middle ear pressure abnormalities or effusion 1, 2
  • Visible air-fluid levels or bubbles behind the tympanic membrane suggest middle ear effusion secondary to ETD 2, 3
  • Retraction pockets, particularly posterosuperior retraction pockets, indicate chronic negative middle ear pressure 4, 1
  • Ossicular erosion visible through the tympanic membrane in severe cases 4, 1
  • Adhesive atelectasis or generalized atelectasis of the tympanic membrane from chronic underventilation 4
  • Areas of tympanic membrane atrophy in chronic ETD 4

Middle Ear Effusion Signs

  • Opaque, amber, or gray tympanic membrane appearance indicating fluid 4
  • Loss of normal tympanic membrane landmarks (light reflex, malleus handle) due to effusion 4

Tympanometry Patterns

Type B (flat) tympanogram indicates middle ear effusion or severely impaired tympanic membrane mobility, while Type C tympanogram shows negative middle ear pressure reflecting incomplete or intermittent ETD. 1, 2

  • Type B tympanogram: Flat tracing with increased stiffness from middle ear effusion 1, 2
  • Type C tympanogram: Negative middle ear pressure (peak at negative pressure) indicating ETD 1, 2
  • Type A tympanogram can occur between episodes when dysfunction temporarily resolves 1
  • Reduced TPP shifts (difference in tympanometric peak pressure between Valsalva and Toynbee maneuvers) in symptomatic ETD patients with Type A tympanograms 5

Respiratory-Synchronous Findings (Patulous ETD)

  • Respiratory-synchronous tympanic membrane movement visible on otoscopy during breathing 6
  • Middle ear compliance greater than 0.07 ml during breathing tasks in 75% of patulous ETD cases 6
  • Respiratory-synchronous compliance pattern on tympanometry during breathing 6

Nasopharyngeal and Related Findings

Videoendoscopic Findings

  • Weakness in soft palate elevation and ET orifice widening (muscular weakness, ETD-M) 7
  • Inflammation at the ET orifice (ETD-I) 7
  • Adenoid tissue impinging and restricting the ET opening (ETD-R) 7
  • Stricture or adhesive changes limiting ET opening (ETD-S or ETD-A) 7

Associated Upper Airway Findings

  • Narrow ear canals with increased wax accumulation 4
  • Signs of chronic otitis media with or without effusion 4
  • Mucopurulent nasal discharge suggesting concurrent sinusitis 3
  • Tonsillopharyngeal findings or postnasal drainage 3

Audiologic Findings

  • Conductive hearing loss is the most common pattern, typically mild (16-40 dB HL) 4
  • Hearing loss may be bilateral or unilateral depending on ETD laterality 2
  • Combined or sensorineural hearing loss can occur but is less common 4

Otomicroscopy/Otoendoscopy Findings

Otomicroscopy or otoendoscopy should be performed when uncertainty exists after standard otoscopy to assess for structural changes. 1

  • Detailed visualization of retraction pockets and their depth 1
  • Assessment of ossicular chain integrity through translucent areas 1
  • Identification of early cholesteatoma formation in chronic cases 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on non-pneumatic otoscopy alone for primary diagnosis, as it lacks the sensitivity to detect subtle mobility changes 2
  • Recognize that normal tympanic membrane appearance does not exclude ETD, particularly intermittent or patulous forms 1, 8
  • Patient-reported symptoms alone have very poor specificity and no diagnostic value without objective findings 8
  • Mucosal appearance in the nose cannot distinguish allergic from nonallergic causes of ETD 3

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Begin with pneumatic otoscopy to assess tympanic membrane mobility and appearance 1, 2
  2. Perform tympanometry if diagnosis remains uncertain after pneumatic otoscopy 1, 2
  3. Use otomicroscopy or otoendoscopy to evaluate for structural changes (retraction pockets, ossicular erosion, atelectasis) 1
  4. Obtain audiometry when ETD is associated with middle ear effusion or structural tympanic membrane changes 1
  5. Consider nasopharyngoscopy to evaluate for anatomical causes (adenoid hypertrophy, inflammation, masses) 2, 7
  6. For suspected patulous ETD, observe for respiratory-synchronous tympanic membrane movement and measure middle ear compliance during breathing 6

References

Guideline

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Nasal Examination Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Characteristics of tympanogram in symptomatic Eustachian tube dysfunction.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023

Research

Use of middle ear immittance testing in the evaluation of patulous eustachian tube.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.