What is the current evidence on the pathergy test (pathergy test) for diagnosing conditions like Behçet's disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pathergy Test: Current Evidence and Clinical Utility

The pathergy test remains a highly specific diagnostic tool for Behçet's disease, with specificity reaching 98.4% in recent data, though its sensitivity has declined significantly from 64.2% to 35.8% over the past 35 years. 1

What is the Pathergy Test?

The pathergy test evaluates skin hyper-reactivity to minimal trauma by inserting a sterile needle into the forearm skin. 2 A positive result consists of an erythematous papule or pustule (≥2mm) developing at the needle stick site 24-48 hours after the procedure. 1, 2

Diagnostic Performance in Behçet's Disease

Current Test Characteristics

  • Specificity: 98.4% (improved from 86.6% in earlier decades) 1
  • Sensitivity: 35.8% (declined from 64.2% over 35 years) 1
  • Positive Predictive Value: 95.7% (improved from 82.7%) 1
  • Positive Likelihood Ratio: 22.4 (improved from 4.8) 1
  • Diagnostic Odds Ratio: 34.3 (improved from 11.6) 1

The declining sensitivity represents a geographic and temporal phenomenon, with highest rates historically reported along the Silk Road countries. 1

Clinical Interpretation

When the pathergy test is positive, it is virtually synonymous with Behçet's disease, with a 98.4% probability of the diagnosis. 1 However, the negative predictive value has deteriorated to 60.5%, meaning a negative test does not exclude Behçet's disease. 1

Role in Diagnostic Criteria

The pathergy test is incorporated into multiple classification/diagnosis criteria for Behçet's disease. 3 When pathergy testing is removed from these criteria sets:

  • Sensitivity decreases across all criteria (largest loss: 35% for Hubault-Hamza criteria) 3
  • Specificity increases modestly (largest gain: 4.7% for Dilsen criteria) 3
  • Overall accuracy decreases (greatest loss: 20.4% for Hubault-Hamza criteria) 3

The International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD) shows the least dependence on pathergy results, losing only 6.5% sensitivity and 3.6% accuracy when pathergy is excluded. 3

Histopathologic Findings

Histopathologic examination of positive pathergy lesions can enhance diagnostic confidence and correlate with disease activity. 4, 5

Dermal Findings

  • Mixed inflammatory cell infiltration (43.4% of cases) 5
  • Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (21.7%) 5
  • Endothelial swelling and thickening (17.3%) 5
  • Lymphocytic vasculitis (13.0%) 5

Subcutaneous Findings

  • Mixed inflammatory infiltration (39.1%) 5
  • Lymphocyte-rich infiltration (21.7%) 5
  • Neutrophil-rich infiltration (8.7%) 5

Patients with vasculitis on dermis histopathology have statistically significant association with uveitis, potentially indicating more severe disease. 5

Pathergy in Other Conditions

Pathergy is not pathognomonic for Behçet's disease. 2 The phenomenon also occurs in:

  • Pyoderma gangrenosum (lesions often preceded by trauma) 6, 7
  • Sweet's syndrome 2
  • Other neutrophilic dermatoses 2

In pyoderma gangrenosum, pathergy is a well-recognized phenomenon where trauma triggers new lesion development, and surgical debridement should be avoided during active disease. 6, 7

Standardization Challenges

The lack of internationally standardized methodology for performing and interpreting the pathergy test limits its clinical utility. 2 Variations include:

  • Needle gauge and type
  • Depth of insertion
  • Number of puncture sites
  • Timing of assessment (24 vs 48 hours)
  • Criteria for positive result (size threshold, presence of pustule)

Clinical Recommendations

When to Use the Pathergy Test

  • Suspected Behçet's disease with compatible clinical features (recurrent oral ulcers, genital ulcers, uveitis, skin lesions) 1
  • Populations with higher pretest probability (Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, Asian ancestry) 1

Interpretation Algorithm

  1. Positive test (≥2mm papule/pustule at 24-48 hours): Strongly supports Behçet's disease diagnosis with 95.7% positive predictive value 1
  2. Negative test: Does NOT exclude Behçet's disease; proceed with clinical diagnosis based on other criteria 1, 3
  3. Equivocal results: Consider histopathologic examination of the test site 4, 5

Common Pitfalls

  • Over-reliance on negative results: With only 35.8% sensitivity, most Behçet's patients will have negative pathergy tests 1
  • False positives: Can occur in pyoderma gangrenosum and other neutrophilic dermatoses 6, 2
  • Technical variability: Non-standardized technique may produce inconsistent results 2
  • Geographic variation: Test performance varies significantly by population 1

Practical Value

Despite declining sensitivity, the pathergy test has not lost its diagnostic value due to markedly improved specificity and positive predictive value. 1 A positive test result provides strong confirmatory evidence for Behçet's disease, while a negative result should not deter diagnosis in patients with compatible clinical features.

References

Research

The skin pathergy test: innately useful?

Archives of dermatological research, 2010

Research

Histopathologic Study of Pathergy Test in Behçet's Disease.

Indian journal of dermatology, 2014

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.