What are the types of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), including Carbapenemase-producing CRE and non-Carbapenemase-producing CRE, and their mechanisms?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are primarily classified into two types: carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) and non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (non-CP-CRE), with CP-CRE being further subdivided based on the type of carbapenemase they produce, such as KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like enzymes, as identified in a recent study 1. The main difference between these types lies in their resistance mechanisms. CP-CRE produce carbapenemases that directly inactivate carbapenem antibiotics, whereas non-CP-CRE achieve resistance through a combination of mechanisms including the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC β-lactamases, along with decreased membrane permeability due to porin mutations or efflux pump overexpression, as discussed in a guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases 1.

Key Mechanisms and Types of CRE

  • Carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE): These produce enzymes like KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like, which directly hydrolyze carbapenems. The Ambler classification system categorizes these carbapenemases into classes A, B, and D, with KPC belonging to Class A, MBLs (NDM, VIM, IMP) to Class B, and OXA-48-like to Class D 1.
  • Non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (non-CP-CRE): These achieve carbapenem resistance through mechanisms such as the production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases combined with decreased membrane permeability or efflux pump overexpression.

Clinical Importance and Treatment

The distinction between CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE is crucial because CP-CRE generally exhibit higher resistance levels, are associated with higher treatment failure rates, and necessitate more aggressive infection control measures due to their ability to spread resistance genes horizontally to other bacteria, as emphasized in a study on the diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria 1. For the treatment of infections caused by KPC-producing CRE, novel β-lactam agents such as ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are strongly recommended as first-line treatment options, based on their efficacy and safety profiles demonstrated in recent studies 1. Imipenem/relebactam and cefiderocol may also be considered as potential alternatives, although the evidence for their use in KPC-producing CRE infections is currently limited to in vitro studies and requires further clinical validation. The choice between these agents should consider factors such as the site of infection, local epidemiology, and the emergence of resistance, highlighting the need for rapid testing to identify specific carbapenemases and guide antibiotic therapy, as recommended in guidelines endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases 1.

From the Research

Types of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

  • Carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE): These bacteria produce enzymes called carbapenemases that deactivate carbapenems and most other β-lactam antibiotics 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • Non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (non-CP-CRE): These bacteria are resistant to carbapenems but do not produce carbapenemases 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Mechanisms of Resistance

  • Carbapenemase production: CP-CRE produce enzymes that hydrolyze carbapenems, rendering them ineffective 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • Other mechanisms: Non-CP-CRE may exhibit resistance through other mechanisms, such as porin loss or efflux pump overexpression 5.

Comparison of CP-CRE and Non-CP-CRE

  • Mortality: CP-CRE are associated with higher mortality rates compared to non-CP-CRE 6.
  • Antibiotic resistance: CP-CRE tend to have higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to meropenem compared to non-CP-CRE 6.
  • Treatment outcomes: The odds of dying within 14 days are more than 4 times greater for CP-CRE compared to non-CP-CRE bacteremic patients 6.

Treatment Options

  • Older agents: Polymyxins, fosfomycin, and aminoglycosides are used to treat CRE infections, although their efficacy and toxicity are concerns 2, 3, 5.
  • Newer agents: Ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, plazomicin, and eravacycline are newer antibiotics with potential for treating CRE infections 3, 4.
  • Combination therapy: High-dose and combination strategies, including the use of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, may be considered for severe CRE infections 3, 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021

Research

Management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2019

Research

Comparing the Outcomes of Patients With Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.