Does this MRI finding still appear to be a hemangioma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRI Assessment of Right Lower Neck Cystic Lesion

This MRI finding is NOT consistent with a hemangioma and requires further diagnostic workup with contrast-enhanced imaging to characterize this cystic neck mass.

Why This is Not a Hemangioma

The described imaging characteristics are fundamentally incompatible with hemangioma:

  • Hemangiomas demonstrate markedly hyperintense T2 signal with intermediate T1 signal intensity, not the described T1 hypointense/T2 hyperintense cystic appearance 1, 2
  • Hemangiomas are solid vascular lesions that show avid enhancement with contrast, demonstrating either peripheral nodular enhancement with centripetal filling or diffuse enhancement similar to adjacent vessels 2, 3
  • The presence of internal septations within a cystic lesion is characteristic of truly cystic masses or cystic-appearing solid tumors, not typical hemangiomas 4

Critical Imaging Features Present

Your lesion demonstrates:

  • Well-circumscribed cystic morphology with internal septation measuring 3.7 x 1.8 cm 4
  • T1 hypointense, T2/FLAIR hyperintense signal consistent with fluid content 4
  • Location in right lower neck above lateral clavicle at T1-T2 level
  • Associated bilateral level I cervical lymphadenopathy (sub-centimeter nodes)

Differential Diagnosis to Consider

This imaging pattern suggests:

  • Cystic hygroma (lymphangioma) - most common cystic neck mass with septations in this location
  • Branchial cleft cyst - though typically more anterior
  • Cystic schwannoma or neurofibroma - peripheral nerve sheath tumors can show bright T2 signal and cystic degeneration 4
  • Cystic metastatic lymph node - particularly given the bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy
  • Venous malformation - low-flow vascular malformation can appear cystic

Mandatory Next Steps

Contrast-enhanced MRI is essential to distinguish truly cystic lesions from solid masses with cystic degeneration 4:

  • If no internal enhancement is present → likely truly cystic lesion (lymphangioma, branchial cleft cyst)
  • If wall thickening, nodules, or internal enhancement is present → solid lesion must be suspected and biopsy considered 4
  • Evaluate for "split fat sign," "string sign," or "target sign" which would suggest peripheral nerve sheath tumor 4

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not assume this is benign without contrast enhancement evaluation. Solid malignant masses including synovial sarcomas, myxofibrosarcomas, and soft-tissue metastases can exhibit bright T2 signal simulating a cyst 4. The presence of bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, though sub-centimeter, raises concern for potential malignancy and mandates thorough characterization.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.