Are inflammatory markers elevated in patients with Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Inflammatory Markers in Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO)

Inflammatory markers are NOT elevated in patients with Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) when SIBO occurs in isolation. 1, 2

Evidence from Direct Studies

The most definitive evidence comes from a direct study measuring fecal calprotectin concentrations (FCC) in SIBO patients, which demonstrated that FCC in patients with SIBO were not significantly different compared to healthy controls (p = 0.907), indicating no subclinical intestinal inflammatory changes involving neutrophils. 2 This finding is reinforced by current guideline recommendations stating that elevated calprotectin levels should prompt investigation for alternative causes of inflammation rather than attributing them to bacterial overgrowth itself. 1

Critical Distinction: SIBO vs. Concurrent Inflammatory Conditions

The relationship between SIBO and inflammatory markers becomes more complex when SIBO coexists with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD):

  • In Crohn's disease patients with concurrent SIBO, fecal calprotectin is significantly elevated (median 485.8 vs. 132.7 μg/g; P=0.004), but this elevation reflects the underlying intestinal inflammation from Crohn's disease, not the SIBO itself. 3

  • SIBO-positive Crohn's patients had increased FCC and stricturing disease with odds ratios of 9.43 (P<0.0001) and 3.83 (P=0.025) respectively, demonstrating that the inflammatory markers correlate with the IBD activity rather than bacterial overgrowth. 3

  • Systemic inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were comparable between SIBO-positive and SIBO-negative Crohn's patients, further confirming that SIBO does not independently drive systemic inflammation. 3

Immunologic Response Without Classical Inflammation

While SIBO does not cause elevation of traditional inflammatory markers, there is evidence of immune activation:

  • Increased immunoglobulin levels have been observed in SIBO, suggesting a possible immune response to bacterial overgrowth without the neutrophil-mediated inflammation that would elevate calprotectin or CRP. 4

  • In HIV-associated autonomic neuropathies with SIBO, plasma sCD14 (a marker of macrophage activation) and TNFα declined by 19% (p=0.015) and 12% (p=0.004) respectively after SIBO treatment with pyridostigmine, indicating that SIBO may contribute to immune activation through bacterial translocation mechanisms rather than direct mucosal inflammation. 5

Clinical Implications for Diagnostic Workup

When evaluating patients with suspected SIBO who have elevated inflammatory markers, you must investigate for concurrent inflammatory conditions rather than attributing the elevation to SIBO alone. 1 The diagnostic approach should include:

  • Fecal calprotectin levels >50-60 mg/g have pooled sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.87 for detecting organic inflammation in IBD, making this an appropriate screening tool to identify concurrent inflammatory disease. 1

  • In post-surgical Crohn's patients, rising calprotectin indicates anastomotic recurrence rather than SIBO, requiring distinct therapeutic approaches. 1

  • SIBO and elevated inflammatory markers should be treated as separate conditions: antibiotics (typically rifaximin 550mg twice daily for 1-2 weeks) for SIBO and anti-inflammatory therapy for the inflammatory process. 6, 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume that elevated inflammatory markers in a patient with gastrointestinal symptoms and positive SIBO breath testing are caused by the bacterial overgrowth. 1, 2 This is a critical error that can lead to:

  • Delayed diagnosis of IBD or other inflammatory conditions 3
  • Inappropriate treatment with antibiotics alone when anti-inflammatory therapy is needed 1
  • Failure to recognize that in IBD patients, the stricturing phenotype (43.3% vs. 19.3%, P=0.015) is more common with SIBO, requiring both structural and infectious management 3

The absence of elevated inflammatory markers does not exclude SIBO, as SIBO is diagnosed through breath testing or small bowel aspiration, not inflammatory biomarkers. 6, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.