What is the most likely diagnosis for a patient with progressive shoulder pain and a positive drop arm test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Drop Arm Test: Diagnostic Significance

A positive drop arm test is most suggestive of a supraspinatus tear, as this test specifically evaluates the integrity and function of the supraspinatus tendon by assessing the patient's ability to eccentrically control shoulder abduction.

Understanding the Drop Arm Test

The drop arm test involves passively abducting the patient's arm to 90 degrees, then releasing it and asking the patient to slowly lower the arm back to neutral position. When this maneuver elicits significant pain or the patient cannot control the descent (the arm "drops"), it indicates supraspinatus pathology 1, 2.

Diagnostic Performance

Specificity for Supraspinatus Tears

The drop arm test demonstrates exceptionally high specificity for detecting supraspinatus tears:

  • Specificity ranges from 0.93 to 0.99 across multiple studies, making it one of the most specific tests for rotator cuff pathology 1, 2
  • The test has a positive predictive value of 0.97, meaning when positive, there is a 97% probability that a supraspinatus tear is present 2
  • The diagnostic odds ratio is particularly strong when combined with other tests like the Neer sign 1

Distinguishing Full-Thickness from Partial Tears

The drop arm test shows equal specificity (0.98) for both partial and full-thickness tears, making it reliable across the spectrum of rotator cuff pathology 2. The combination of the painful arc sign, drop arm sign, and infraspinatus muscle test produces the best post-test probability (91%) for full-thickness rotator cuff tears 3.

Why Not the Other Options?

Subacromial Impingement

While subacromial impingement can cause pain with shoulder movement, the Neer and Hawkins tests are more specific for impingement syndrome rather than the drop arm test 3. The drop arm test specifically assesses tendon integrity, not just impingement 1.

Osteoarthritis of Glenohumeral Joint

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis typically presents with global loss of range of motion and pain at end-range, not the specific inability to control eccentric abduction that characterizes a positive drop arm test 4.

Acromioclavicular Ligament Tear

AC joint pathology is better assessed with the cross-body adduction test, which stresses the AC joint specifically 3. The drop arm test does not isolate AC joint structures.

Distal Clavicular Fracture

Fractures would be evident on plain radiographs and would present with localized tenderness, deformity, and crepitus rather than the specific functional deficit seen with the drop arm test 4, 5.

Clinical Interpretation Considerations

Sensitivity Limitations

The drop arm test has relatively low sensitivity (0.19-0.73), meaning a negative test does not rule out a supraspinatus tear 1, 2, 6. The test is most useful when positive, not when negative.

Optimal Positivity Criteria

The test should be considered positive when there is pain associated with weakness or inability to control the descent, as this combination shows the highest diagnostic precision 1, 7.

Next Steps After Positive Test

When the drop arm test is positive, MRI without contrast or ultrasound (if local expertise available) should be obtained to confirm the diagnosis and assess tear characteristics including size, retraction, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration 4, 8. These imaging findings are critical for determining whether conservative management or surgical intervention is appropriate 8.

The American College of Radiology rates both MRI without contrast and ultrasound as 9/9 for appropriateness in evaluating suspected rotator cuff pathology 4, 8.

References

Research

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2005

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnostic Value of Clinical Tests for Supraspinatus Tendon Tears.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2018

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Rotator Cuff Pathology

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.