What is the most likely mechanism of syncope in a patient who experienced a syncopal episode after being struck in the chest by a fastball pitch, was treated with an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) that delivered a shock, and now presents with a normal sinus rhythm and borderline tachycardia on Electrocardiogram (ECG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ventricular Fibrillation

The most likely mechanism of syncope in this patient is ventricular fibrillation (VF), as evidenced by the fact that the AED delivered a shock—a device that only recommends shocks for shockable rhythms like VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. 1

Clinical Reasoning

The key diagnostic clue is that the AED delivered a shock, which is definitive evidence of a shockable rhythm at the scene. 1 AEDs are highly accurate rhythm analysis systems with >90% sensitivity for VF and 99-100% specificity for nonshockable rhythms, meaning they will not recommend a shock unless VF or rapid ventricular tachycardia is present. 1

Why This is Ventricular Fibrillation:

  • AEDs only shock VF or pulseless VT: The device analyzed the rhythm and determined it was shockable, which by definition means VF or rapid VT was present. 1

  • Blunt chest trauma mechanism: This patient experienced commotio cordis—a phenomenon where blunt chest impact during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle (just before the T wave peak) can trigger VF. 1 This typically occurs in young athletes struck in the chest by projectiles like baseballs.

  • Immediate collapse after chest impact: The sudden loss of consciousness immediately following chest trauma, requiring defibrillation, is pathognomonic for VF induced by mechanical chest wall impact. 1

  • Successful defibrillation with return to normal rhythm: The patient responded to a single shock and now has normal sinus rhythm, which is consistent with VF that was successfully terminated by defibrillation. 1

Why NOT the Other Options:

Asystole (Option A): AEDs do not deliver shocks for asystole—this is a nonshockable rhythm. 1 The device would have instructed rescuers to perform CPR only, without shock delivery.

Vagal reaction (Option B): Vagal syncope causes bradycardia or brief asystole, not a shockable rhythm. 2 An AED would not recommend a shock for a vagal episode.

Ventricular contusion (Option C): While chest trauma can cause myocardial contusion, this does not directly cause syncope requiring defibrillation. 3 Contusion might cause arrhythmias over time, but the immediate collapse with shockable rhythm indicates VF, not contusion alone.

Clinical Context: Commotio Cordis

This presentation is classic for commotio cordis, where:

  • A projectile strikes the precordium during a narrow vulnerable window (10-30 milliseconds before the T wave peak). 1
  • This mechanical impact triggers VF in a structurally normal heart. 1
  • Immediate defibrillation is lifesaving, with survival rates approaching 90% when defibrillation occurs within the first minute. 1
  • The patient is typically a young, healthy individual with no underlying cardiac disease. 1

Post-Resuscitation Management

Following successful defibrillation from VF:

  • Monitor for recurrent arrhythmias: VF can recur after initial successful defibrillation. 1
  • Evaluate for structural heart disease: Although commotio cordis occurs in structurally normal hearts, echocardiography should be performed to rule out underlying cardiac abnormalities. 2, 3
  • Check cardiac biomarkers: Troponin and CK-MB should be measured, though they are typically normal or minimally elevated in commotio cordis. 1
  • Consider ICD evaluation: While not typically indicated for isolated commotio cordis in structurally normal hearts, any recurrent VF or underlying structural disease would warrant ICD consideration. 1, 2

Key Clinical Pearl

The delivery of a shock by an AED is diagnostic evidence that VF or pulseless VT was present. 1 AEDs have been extensively validated and will not recommend shocks for nonshockable rhythms like asystole, bradycardia, or organized rhythms with pulses. 1 In this clinical scenario of chest trauma with immediate collapse requiring defibrillation, VF is the only plausible mechanism.

Answer: D. Ventricular fibrillation

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Frequent Ventricular Extrasystoles Associated with Cardiogenic Syncope

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The electrocardiogram in the patient with syncope.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.