What is the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) and breast cancer risk?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Oral Contraceptives and Breast Cancer Risk

Current or recent oral contraceptive use is associated with a small but measurable increase in breast cancer risk (relative risk 1.2-1.6), but this risk disappears completely within 10 years of discontinuation, and the absolute risk remains very low in young women despite elevated relative risks. 1, 2

Magnitude and Timing of Risk

For current users, the evidence consistently demonstrates:

  • Relative risk of approximately 1.24-1.31 for current users compared to never-users 1, 2
  • More recent data shows relative risk of 1.08 for current users 1
  • Risk increases with duration: women using oral contraceptives for >5 years show relative risks of 1.33-1.56 3, 4
  • The risk elevation is confined to active use and resolves within 10 years after stopping 1, 2

Critical temporal pattern: The FDA label confirms that among current or recent users (<6 months since last use), relative risks range from 1.19 to 1.33, with longer duration of current use showing relative risks up to 1.4 with more than 8-10 years of use 2. However, five studies comparing ever-users (current or past) versus never-users found no association, with effect estimates ranging from 0.90 to 1.12 2.

Age-Specific Considerations

Young women face the highest relative risk but lowest absolute risk:

  • Women under 34 years have the highest relative risk increase, though baseline breast cancer incidence remains extremely low 1
  • A relative risk of 1.5 in a 25-year-old translates to minimal absolute risk increase given breast cancer rarity at that age 1
  • Women aged 40-49 who used oral contraceptives for ≥5 years may have persistent risk for up to 9 years after discontinuation, though this was based on older high-dose formulations (≥50 mcg estrogen) 2

Special Populations: Family History and BRCA Carriers

Women with family history or BRCA mutations can use oral contraceptives:

  • Current evidence shows women with family history do not have significantly amplified breast cancer risk with oral contraceptive use 1, 5, 6
  • The NCCN states that oral contraceptive use is acceptable for contraception in BRCA carriers, with the risk/benefit ratio uncertain due to contradictory evidence 3
  • Meta-analyses show no significant association between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers 3
  • One case-control study found modest increased risk in BRCA1 carriers (OR 1.20) with ≥5 years use (OR 1.33), particularly before age 40 (OR 1.38) 3
  • Another study found increased risk in BRCA2 carriers with ≥5 years use (OR 2.06) 3
  • Conversely, one study found low-dose oral contraceptives decreased breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers (OR 0.22) 3

The substantial ovarian cancer benefit must be weighed: Oral contraceptives reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45-60% in BRCA1/2 carriers, with risk decreasing further with longer duration of use 3, 5

Absolute Contraindications

Do not prescribe oral contraceptives in these situations:

  • Current breast cancer (Category 4 - unacceptable health risk) because breast cancer is hormonally sensitive and prognosis may worsen 1, 2
  • Past breast cancer with <5 years disease-free (Category 3 - risks usually outweigh benefits) 1
  • Smokers aged ≥35 years (Category 4 due to cardiovascular risks, not breast cancer) 1, 7

Formulation-Specific Risks

Certain progestin formulations show higher associations:

  • Levonorgestrel in triphasic regimens: RR 2.83 4
  • Levonorgestrel in extended cycle regimens: RR 3.49 4
  • Norgestrel in monophasic regimens: RR 1.91 4
  • No significant associations observed for norethindrone, norethindrone acetate, ethynodiol diacetate, desogestrel, norgestimate, or drospirenone, though sample sizes were limited 4

Balancing Cancer Risks and Benefits

Oral contraceptives provide significant cancer protection:

  • Endometrial cancer risk significantly reduced 1
  • Ovarian cancer risk reduced by approximately 50% in general population 1
  • Colorectal cancer risk may be reduced by about 20% 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Exclude absolute contraindications: Current breast cancer or breast cancer within past 5 years 1, 2

  2. Assess cardiovascular risk factors: Age ≥35 with smoking, hypertension, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease significantly increases VTE, MI, and stroke risk beyond breast cancer concerns 1, 7

  3. For women with family history or BRCA mutations:

    • Provide genetic counseling and testing if not already done 3, 5
    • Oral contraceptives are acceptable given no consistent evidence of amplified breast cancer risk and substantial ovarian cancer protection 1, 5
    • Consider low-dose formulations which may have more favorable risk profiles 3
  4. For women over 40 without risk factors:

    • Combined oral contraceptives are Category 2 (benefits generally outweigh risks) 1, 7
    • Consider progestin-only methods or copper IUD as Category 1 alternatives 7
  5. Counsel on temporal risk pattern: Emphasize that any increased breast cancer risk resolves within 10 years of stopping 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not overestimate absolute risk in young women: Despite relative risks of 1.5-2.0, the absolute risk increase is minimal given low baseline breast cancer incidence at younger ages 1
  • Do not assume permanent risk: Risk elevation is confined to current/recent use and disappears within 10 years of cessation 1, 2
  • Do not unnecessarily restrict in women with family history: Evidence does not support significantly amplified risk in this population 1, 5, 6
  • Do not overlook ovarian cancer benefit: When focusing solely on breast cancer risk, the substantial 50% ovarian cancer risk reduction may be overlooked, particularly critical in BRCA carriers 5
  • Do not use older data to counsel patients: Studies from the 1970s used high-dose formulations (≥50 mcg estrogen); current low-dose formulations have different risk profiles 2

References

Guideline

COCP and Breast Cancer Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Birth Control Pills in Patients with a Strong Family History of Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Contraception for Women Over 40

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.