What are Ranson's criteria for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ranson's Criteria for Acute Pancreatitis

Ranson's criteria is a validated multifactor scoring system that uses 11 clinical and laboratory parameters measured at admission and 48 hours to predict severity of acute pancreatitis, with ≥3 positive criteria indicating severe disease with 70-80% accuracy. 1

Components of Ranson's Criteria

The scoring system evaluates specific parameters at two time points:

At Admission (0 hours):

  • Age >55 years
  • White blood cell count >16,000/mm³
  • Blood glucose >200 mg/dL
  • Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >350 IU/L
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >250 IU/L

At 48 Hours:

  • Hematocrit decrease >10%
  • Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) increase >5 mg/dL
  • Serum calcium <8 mg/dL
  • Arterial PO₂ <60 mmHg
  • Base deficit >4 mEq/L
  • Fluid sequestration >6 liters

1, 2

Interpretation and Performance

A Ranson score ≥3 indicates severe acute pancreatitis, with sensitivity of 75-87% and specificity of 68-77.5%. 3 The scoring system achieves overall prognostic accuracy of 70-80% for predicting severe disease. 1

Key Performance Characteristics:

  • Ranson ≥4 provides optimal cut-off for severe disease prediction 4
  • Higher scores correlate with increased mortality, need for operative debridement, and prolonged ICU stay 2
  • Individual components measured at 48 hours (BUN, calcium, base deficit, fluid sequestration) are stronger predictors of mortality than early variables 2

Clinical Application and Limitations

Primary Disadvantage:

The major limitation is the mandatory 48-hour delay before complete scoring can be performed, which prevents early risk stratification. 5 Clinical assessment alone misclassifies approximately 50% of patients. 1, 6

Recommended Complementary Approach:

  • Combine Ranson score with C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to improve prognostication. 1, 6
  • CRP ≥150 mg/L on day 3 indicates severe disease 3
  • Using Ranson ≥3 OR CRP ≥150 mg/L achieves 90.1% sensitivity for detecting moderately severe disease and 93.5% for severe disease 7
  • Using Ranson ≥3 AND CRP ≥150 mg/L achieves 97.1% specificity for both categories 7

Comparison with Alternative Scoring Systems

While Ranson criteria remain widely used, alternative systems offer distinct advantages:

  • APACHE II score (≥8 indicates severe disease) provides equivalent accuracy and allows daily monitoring for disease progression, though it is more complex to calculate 1, 3
  • BISAP score (≥2 indicates severe disease) can be calculated within 24 hours with comparable accuracy (AUC 0.80 for severe pancreatitis), eliminating the 48-hour delay 3
  • Glasgow score (≥3 indicates severe disease) is validated in UK populations with similar 70-80% accuracy 1, 6

Recommended Clinical Algorithm

Within first 48 hours:

  • Begin collecting Ranson criteria parameters at admission and 48 hours 1
  • Measure baseline CRP and repeat on day 3 6, 3
  • Calculate APACHE II score for immediate risk assessment if available 6
  • Monitor for clinical signs of organ failure (pulmonary, circulatory, or renal insufficiency), which independently indicate severe disease 1, 6

After 48 hours:

  • Calculate final Ranson score 1
  • Interpret in combination with CRP levels for optimal sensitivity and specificity 7
  • Perform contrast-enhanced CT scan between days 3-10 in patients with predicted severe disease to assess pancreatic necrosis 6, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Grading Severity of Pancreatitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Correlation between Ranson score and red cell distribution width in acute pancreatitis.

Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2017

Guideline

Acute Pancreatitis Scoring and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Can C-reactive protein levels increase the accuracy of the Ranson score in predicting the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis? A prospective cohort study.

The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.