Ranson's Criteria for Acute Pancreatitis
Ranson's criteria is a validated multifactor scoring system that uses 11 clinical and laboratory parameters measured at admission and 48 hours to predict severity of acute pancreatitis, with ≥3 positive criteria indicating severe disease with 70-80% accuracy. 1
Components of Ranson's Criteria
The scoring system evaluates specific parameters at two time points:
At Admission (0 hours):
- Age >55 years
- White blood cell count >16,000/mm³
- Blood glucose >200 mg/dL
- Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >350 IU/L
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >250 IU/L
At 48 Hours:
- Hematocrit decrease >10%
- Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) increase >5 mg/dL
- Serum calcium <8 mg/dL
- Arterial PO₂ <60 mmHg
- Base deficit >4 mEq/L
- Fluid sequestration >6 liters
Interpretation and Performance
A Ranson score ≥3 indicates severe acute pancreatitis, with sensitivity of 75-87% and specificity of 68-77.5%. 3 The scoring system achieves overall prognostic accuracy of 70-80% for predicting severe disease. 1
Key Performance Characteristics:
- Ranson ≥4 provides optimal cut-off for severe disease prediction 4
- Higher scores correlate with increased mortality, need for operative debridement, and prolonged ICU stay 2
- Individual components measured at 48 hours (BUN, calcium, base deficit, fluid sequestration) are stronger predictors of mortality than early variables 2
Clinical Application and Limitations
Primary Disadvantage:
The major limitation is the mandatory 48-hour delay before complete scoring can be performed, which prevents early risk stratification. 5 Clinical assessment alone misclassifies approximately 50% of patients. 1, 6
Recommended Complementary Approach:
- Combine Ranson score with C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to improve prognostication. 1, 6
- CRP ≥150 mg/L on day 3 indicates severe disease 3
- Using Ranson ≥3 OR CRP ≥150 mg/L achieves 90.1% sensitivity for detecting moderately severe disease and 93.5% for severe disease 7
- Using Ranson ≥3 AND CRP ≥150 mg/L achieves 97.1% specificity for both categories 7
Comparison with Alternative Scoring Systems
While Ranson criteria remain widely used, alternative systems offer distinct advantages:
- APACHE II score (≥8 indicates severe disease) provides equivalent accuracy and allows daily monitoring for disease progression, though it is more complex to calculate 1, 3
- BISAP score (≥2 indicates severe disease) can be calculated within 24 hours with comparable accuracy (AUC 0.80 for severe pancreatitis), eliminating the 48-hour delay 3
- Glasgow score (≥3 indicates severe disease) is validated in UK populations with similar 70-80% accuracy 1, 6
Recommended Clinical Algorithm
Within first 48 hours:
- Begin collecting Ranson criteria parameters at admission and 48 hours 1
- Measure baseline CRP and repeat on day 3 6, 3
- Calculate APACHE II score for immediate risk assessment if available 6
- Monitor for clinical signs of organ failure (pulmonary, circulatory, or renal insufficiency), which independently indicate severe disease 1, 6
After 48 hours: