Management of First-Degree Atrioventricular Block
For most patients with first-degree AV block, no treatment is required—observation with routine ECG monitoring is sufficient unless the PR interval exceeds 300 ms or symptoms clearly attributable to the conduction delay are present. 1
Understanding First-Degree AV Block
First-degree AV block is actually a misnomer—it represents delayed conduction (PR interval >200 ms) rather than true block, since all atrial impulses still conduct to the ventricles. 2 For this reason, it is more accurately termed "first-degree AV delay." 2
Initial Evaluation Strategy
For Asymptomatic Patients with PR <300 ms:
- No further testing is typically required if QRS duration is normal. 1
- Regular follow-up with routine ECG monitoring is sufficient. 1
- Athletes with asymptomatic first-degree AV block can participate in all competitive sports unless structural heart disease is present. 1
For Patients Requiring Further Workup:
Pursue additional evaluation if any of the following are present:
- PR interval ≥300 ms 1
- Abnormal QRS duration or bundle branch block 1
- Symptoms of fatigue, exercise intolerance, or lightheadedness 2, 1
- Coexisting bifascicular block 1
- Neuromuscular diseases (myotonic dystrophy, Kearns-Sayre syndrome) 1
Recommended testing includes:
- Transthoracic echocardiogram to exclude structural heart disease 1
- Exercise stress test to assess whether PR interval shortens appropriately with exercise 1
- 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring to detect progression to higher-degree block 1
When Permanent Pacing Is Indicated
Class IIa Recommendation (Reasonable):
Permanent pacing is reasonable for marked first-degree AV block (typically PR >300 ms) when symptoms are clearly attributable to the AV block. 2, 1 This includes:
- Symptoms resembling "pseudo-pacemaker syndrome" (fatigue, exertional intolerance) due to loss of AV synchrony 2
- Decreased cardiac output and increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from the prolonged PR interval 2
Class III (Not Indicated):
- Permanent pacemaker implantation is not indicated for asymptomatic first-degree AV block. 1
- There is little evidence that pacemakers improve survival in isolated first-degree AV block. 2
Important Clinical Pitfalls
Risk of Progression:
First-degree AV block may not be entirely benign in all patients. 3 A study using insertable cardiac monitors found that 40.5% of patients with baseline first-degree AV block eventually required pacemaker implantation, with 93.3% needing it due to progression to more severe bradycardia or higher-grade block. 3 This suggests first-degree AV block can be a risk marker for intermittent conduction disease. 3
Special Populations Requiring Close Monitoring:
- Neuromuscular diseases: Patients with myotonic dystrophy or Kearns-Sayre syndrome require close surveillance as they may progress to higher-degree block. 1
- Bifascicular block: Monitor for progression, as the combination increases risk. 1
- Structural heart disease: Any underlying cardiac pathology warrants closer follow-up. 1
Cardiology Referral Indications
Refer to cardiology when:
- PR interval >300 ms 1
- Symptoms of fatigue or exercise intolerance clearly related to the conduction delay 1
- Coexisting bundle branch block or bifascicular block 1
- Structural heart disease present 1
- Evidence of progression to higher-degree block on monitoring 1
Prognosis and Patient Education
Most cases of isolated first-degree AV block have excellent prognosis. 1 However, educate patients to report symptoms that might indicate progression: syncope, presyncope, severe fatigue, or exercise intolerance. 1 These warrant immediate re-evaluation for higher-degree block.