What are the implications of significant mitral annular calcification in a 67-year-old male?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) in a 67-year-old male requires monitoring but typically doesn't need specific treatment unless symptomatic, and I recommend regular cardiac follow-up with echocardiography every 1-2 years to assess progression, as supported by the guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke 1. The patient's condition should be managed with a focus on modifying risk factors to prevent progression and reduce the risk of associated cardiovascular events. Key aspects of management include:

  • Maintaining blood pressure below 130/80 mmHg with medications like ACE inhibitors or ARBs if needed
  • Targeting LDL cholesterol below 70 mg/dL with statins such as atorvastatin 20-40 mg daily
  • Achieving optimal diabetes control if applicable (HbA1c <7%)
  • Encouraging smoking cessation Daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg) may be considered if there are additional cardiovascular risk factors, although there is no evidence that anticoagulant therapy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with mitral annular calcification, as noted in the guidelines 1. MAC is associated with aging and atherosclerosis, representing calcium deposition in the fibrous ring supporting the mitral valve, and while often an incidental finding, it can progress to cause mitral stenosis or regurgitation in some cases. The calcification process shares pathophysiological mechanisms with vascular calcification, which explains why controlling cardiovascular risk factors is important for management, and the risk of stroke is increased in patients with mitral annular calcification, with a reported risk ratio of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2-3.6) in the Framingham study 1.

From the Research

Significant Mitral Annular Calcification in a 67-year-old Male

  • Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a condition where calcium deposits form on the mitral valve annulus, which can lead to mitral valve dysfunction 2, 3, 4.
  • The management of MAC remains challenging, and optimal treatment options depend on various factors, including the extent of calcification, valve function, and patient comorbidities 2, 3, 4.
  • Surgical management options for MAC include mitral valve repair, conventional mitral valve replacement, and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) 2, 3, 4.
  • TMVR has emerged as a feasible option for patients with severe MAC who are at high risk for surgical complications or have prohibitive anatomy 2, 3, 4.
  • The diagnosis and treatment of MAC are complex and require a multidisciplinary approach, involving cardiac surgeons, interventional cardiologists, and imaging specialists 3, 4.
  • MAC is often associated with atherosclerosis and shares common risk factors, such as lipid accumulation and calcium deposition 5.
  • The presence and extent of MAC can be evaluated using multimodality imaging tools, including echocardiography and computed tomography 6, 5.
  • The severity of MAC can impact valve function and patient outcomes, with more extensive calcification associated with increased risk of mitral stenosis and regurgitation 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Surgical management of mitral annular calcification.

Current opinion in cardiology, 2020

Research

Calcification of the mitral valve and annulus: systematic evaluation of effects on valve anatomy and function.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.