Is a placental venous lake measuring 1.8 cm on anatomy ultrasound a concerning finding if everything else is normal?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

A placental venous lake measuring 1.8 cm on anatomy ultrasound is generally not concerning if everything else appears normal. These venous lakes (also called placental lakes or subchorionic lakes) are common findings during pregnancy ultrasounds and represent areas of maternal blood pooling within the placenta. The size of 1.8 cm falls within what is typically considered normal, as venous lakes under 5 cm are usually not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, as suggested by a recent review of the literature 1. No specific treatment or additional monitoring is needed for an isolated placental venous lake of this size in an otherwise normal pregnancy.

Some studies have reported adverse outcomes associated with placental lakes, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, and intrauterine fetal demise, particularly if the lakes are multiple and large and the placenta is thick 1. However, these findings are not directly applicable to a single, small placental lake like the one in question. The clinical significance of large placental lakes has been investigated, and while some studies have found correlations between large lakes and adverse outcomes, such as fetal small-for-gestational-age status 2, these findings do not necessarily apply to smaller lakes.

In the context of this case, where the placental venous lake is small (1.8 cm) and isolated, with no other abnormal findings, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is likely low. The formation of these structures is a part of normal placental development, where maternal blood enters the intervillous space through spiral arteries and sometimes pools before returning through venous channels. While very large lakes or those associated with other abnormal findings might warrant closer monitoring, a 1.8 cm venous lake as an isolated finding should not cause concern and does not affect placental function or fetal development, as supported by the most recent and highest quality study available 1. Your regular prenatal care schedule can continue as planned.

Key points to consider include:

  • The size of the placental lake (1.8 cm) is within the normal range.
  • The lake is isolated, with no other abnormal findings.
  • The patient's pregnancy has been otherwise normal.
  • The risk of adverse outcomes associated with small, isolated placental lakes is low, according to the most recent literature review 1.

References

Research

The clinical significance of large placental lakes.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.