What is the role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) in the diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

AMH in Diagnosis of PCOS

AMH is not currently recommended as a standalone diagnostic test for PCOS and should not replace the established Rotterdam criteria (requiring 2 of 3: oligo/anovulation, hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovarian morphology), though it may serve as a supportive marker when ultrasound is unavailable or unreliable. 1, 2

Current Guideline Position

The international evidence-based guidelines explicitly state that AMH is not clinically applicable for detecting polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) or diagnosing PCOS outside of research settings until critical standardization issues are resolved. 1 The Endocrine Society confirms that AMH should not yet replace established diagnostic criteria. 2

Why AMH Cannot Stand Alone

The systematic review informing international guidelines identified fundamental limitations that prevent clinical adoption: 1

  • Significant heterogeneity exists across studies with poorly defined PCOS and control populations
  • Inconsistent cut-off values ranging from 24.29 to 100 pmol/L across different studies, with no international standard 1
  • Assay variability with substantial discrepancies in between-assay conversion factors and differential responses to pre-analytical handling 1
  • Significant overlap in AMH levels between women with and without PCOS, limiting standalone diagnostic utility 2

When AMH May Provide Supportive Information

Despite these limitations, AMH demonstrates consistent biological associations with PCOS:

  • Serum AMH levels are significantly elevated in women with PCOS compared to normal ovulatory women, with levels 2-3 times higher 1, 3
  • AMH correlates primarily with androgen status (testosterone, p<0.001) rather than insulin resistance, adiposity, or gonadotropins 3
  • AMH may be particularly useful in adolescents within 8 years of menarche where ultrasound is contraindicated due to poor specificity 1, 2

Diagnostic Performance Data

Research studies show variable but generally good diagnostic accuracy: 1

  • Dewailly 2011: 35 pmol/L threshold achieved 92% sensitivity and 97% specificity (AUC 0.973) 1
  • Carmina 2016: >33.57 pmol/L showed 79% sensitivity and 96% specificity (AUC 0.952) 1
  • Recent study 2023: 3.75 ng/mL (26.78 pmol/L) cutoff yielded 79% sensitivity and 81% specificity (AUC 0.969) 4
  • Study 2013: 3.94 ng/mL cutoff achieved 80% sensitivity and 89.8% specificity (AUC 0.916) 5

However, one study found that AMH ≥30 pmol/L correctly identified only 79% of PCOS cases, and elevated AMH in lean women may not indicate PCOS but rather functional hypothalamic hypogonadism. 3, 6

Practical Clinical Algorithm

When evaluating suspected PCOS, follow this sequence:

  1. Apply Rotterdam criteria first - document at least 2 of 3 features: 2, 7

    • Oligo/anovulation (cycle length >35 days)
    • Clinical/biochemical hyperandrogenism (total testosterone by LC-MS/MS preferred, calculated free testosterone, or androstenedione)
    • PCOM on ultrasound (≥20 follicles per ovary or ovarian volume >10 mL)
  2. Consider AMH measurement in specific scenarios: 2, 8

    • Adolescents <8 years post-menarche where ultrasound should not be used
    • When reliable ultrasound is unavailable or technically inadequate
    • When typical clinical/laboratory findings are equivocal
    • To support diagnosis when only one Rotterdam criterion is clearly met
  3. Interpret AMH with caution: 1, 2, 6

    • Values >30-35 pmol/L support PCOS diagnosis but are not definitive
    • Age-specific reference ranges are critical as AMH naturally declines with age
    • In lean women with elevated AMH, consider functional hypothalamic hypogonadism (higher SHBG >111 nmol/L suggests FHH rather than PCOS)

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never diagnose PCOS based solely on elevated AMH - significant overlap exists with normal women and other conditions 2, 6
  • Do not use AMH in adolescents as a replacement for clinical judgment - physiological multifollicular ovaries are common in this age group 1, 2
  • Recognize assay-specific differences - results are not interchangeable between different AMH assay platforms 1
  • Distinguish PCOS from functional hypothalamic hypogonadism in lean women - both show elevated AMH, but FHH has higher SHBG and responds to weight gain 6

Additional Metabolic Assessment Required

Once PCOS is diagnosed (with or without AMH support), perform comprehensive metabolic screening: 2, 7

  • Two-hour oral glucose tolerance test for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes
  • Fasting lipid profile for dyslipidemia screening
  • Calculate BMI and waist-hip ratio
  • Screen for cardiovascular risk factors given long-term health implications

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The role of anti-Mullerian hormone and other correlates in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 2023

Research

Elevated anti-Mullerian hormone in lean women may not indicate polycystic ovarian syndrome.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2017

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Options for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Anti-Müllerian hormone and polycystic ovary syndrome.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.