Are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) considered a form of immunotherapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Are Monoclonal Antibodies Considered Immunotherapy?

Yes, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are definitively considered a form of immunotherapy, as they work by modulating the immune system to target disease, whether by blocking immune checkpoints to enhance anti-tumor immunity or by directly targeting specific antigens to activate immune effector functions. 1, 2

Definition and Classification

Monoclonal antibodies represent a major class of immunotherapy that has transformed cancer treatment over the past decade. 1

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab (anti-PD-1), pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), and atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) are explicitly classified as immunotherapy agents that work by blocking inhibitory pathways and restoring T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. 1

  • The FDA drug label for nivolumab describes it as "a monoclonal antibody that belongs to a class of drugs that bind to either the programmed death-receptor 1 (PD-1) or the PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1), blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, thereby removing inhibition of the immune response." 2

  • These agents are distinguished from traditional chemotherapy by their mechanism: they enhance natural immune system functions rather than directly killing cancer cells through cytotoxic mechanisms. 3, 4

Mechanisms That Define Them as Immunotherapy

The classification of mAbs as immunotherapy is based on their fundamental mechanisms of action:

  • Immune checkpoint blockade: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies prevent the binding of inhibitory ligands to their receptors on T cells, restoring T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and allowing the immune system to fight cancer. 2

  • Activation of innate immune effector functions: Many therapeutic mAbs (including anti-HER2 and anti-CD20 agents) function primarily through engagement with Fc receptors to activate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and other innate immune mechanisms. 5

  • Induction of long-lasting anti-tumor immune responses: Unlike chemotherapy, mAbs can promote durable immune memory, leading to sustained responses even after treatment discontinuation. 3

Clinical Context and Guidelines

Multiple authoritative guidelines explicitly refer to monoclonal antibodies as immunotherapy:

  • The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) 2017 consensus recommendations specifically address "managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy," referring to these mAb agents as immunotherapy throughout. 1

  • The 2016 Annals of Oncology guidelines discuss "immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy" and state that "monoclonal antibodies targeted against the immune checkpoint molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1" are "now considered to be a main component of cancer therapy." 1

  • The 2019 Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer guidelines discuss immune checkpoint inhibitors as immunotherapy agents, noting that "the monoclonal antibodies prevent the binding of PD-1 to its ligand PD-L1, restore the T cell-mediated cytotoxicity." 1

Important Distinctions

Not all monoclonal antibodies function identically as immunotherapy:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors work by removing brakes on the immune system and are the prototypical immunotherapy mAbs. 1

  • Tumor-targeting mAbs (e.g., anti-HER2, anti-CD20) primarily activate innate immune effector mechanisms but are still considered immunotherapy because they harness immune cells to eliminate cancer. 5

  • Bispecific antibodies used in multiple myeloma are explicitly discussed as immunotherapy with similar toxicity profiles to CAR T-cell therapy due to their immune mechanisms of action. 1

Clinical Implications

The classification of mAbs as immunotherapy has critical clinical implications:

  • Unique toxicity profile: These agents cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) rather than traditional chemotherapy toxicities, requiring different management strategies including immunosuppression with corticosteroids. 1, 2

  • Infection risk: Because they modulate immune function, these agents can increase susceptibility to opportunistic infections including tuberculosis reactivation, requiring specific screening and prophylaxis protocols. 1

  • Delayed and prolonged effects: Immunotherapy-related adverse events typically have delayed onset and prolonged duration compared to chemotherapy, and can even occur after treatment discontinuation. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy.

Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2020

Research

Monoclonal antibodies in cancer immunotherapy.

Molecular biology reports, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.