What are the Canadian screening guidelines for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) testing for colorectal cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Canadian FIT Screening Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer

The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) recommends fecal occult blood testing (either guaiac-based or FIT) every 2 years for average-risk adults aged 50-74 years, and does NOT recommend colonoscopy as a primary screening test in Canada. 1

Screening Age and Population

  • Start screening at age 50 for average-risk individuals 1
  • Stop screening at age 75 - do not screen individuals 75 years or older 1
  • These recommendations apply to asymptomatic adults with no family history of colorectal cancer and no prior screening 2

FIT Testing Specifications

The Canadian approach differs significantly from U.S. guidelines in two key ways:

  • Screening interval: Every 2 years (not annually as recommended in the U.S.) 1
  • Colonoscopy is NOT recommended as a primary screening test in Canada, largely due to limited access and resource constraints 1

Technical Details from Provincial Programs

  • Canadian provincial programs use either guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests or fecal immunochemical tests 3
  • When FIT is used, quantitative tests are preferred over qualitative tests 1
  • Lower threshold cut-offs (20 μg/g or lower) are favored to define a positive test 1
  • Single-sample FIT collection is the standard approach 3

Follow-up of Positive Results

When FIT is positive, colonoscopy is the mandatory next step 1

  • Target: 80% of individuals with positive FIT should complete colonoscopy within 180 days 3
  • Current Canadian performance shows 80.5% uptake of colonoscopy within 180 days after abnormal FIT, ranging from 67.8% to 89.5% by province 3
  • Delays beyond 6 months after positive FIT significantly increase risk: adjusted OR 1.31 for any colorectal cancer and 2.09 for advanced stage disease 4

Performance Metrics from Canadian Programs

Real-world data from five Canadian provincial programs (2009-2011) demonstrates:

  • Positive predictive value for adenoma: 35.9% for guaiac-based tests and 50.6% for FIT 3
  • Adenoma detection rate: 16.9 per 1000 screened 3
  • Cancer detection rate: 1.8 per 1000 screened 3
  • Of invasive cancers detected, 64.6% were stage I or II 3
  • Overall positivity rate: 4.4% 3

Critical Differences from U.S. Guidelines

The Canadian approach is more conservative than recent U.S. recommendations:

  • U.S. guidelines now recommend starting at age 45 (American Cancer Society 2018, USPSTF 2021), while Canada maintains age 50 1, 5
  • U.S. recommends annual FIT, while Canada recommends biennial testing 1
  • U.S. includes colonoscopy as a tier 1 screening option, while Canada does not recommend it as a primary screening test 1

The rationale for biennial (every 2 years) rather than annual screening:

  • Most RCT data examined biennial screening with fecal occult blood tests 1
  • A large U.S. study found no significant difference between annual and biennial screening in overall or cumulative colorectal cancer mortality through 30 years of follow-up 1
  • Biennial screening reduces harms and burden while achieving similar mortality reduction 1

Emerging Considerations

Recent evidence suggests Canadian guidelines may need updating:

  • Colorectal cancer incidence is rising in Canadians under age 50, similar to U.S. trends 5
  • Modeling studies suggest FIT screening starting at age 45 would reduce incidence by 103 per 100,000 and deaths by 43 per 100,000, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $5,850 per QALY 6
  • FIT screening at age 40 would reduce incidence by 161 per 100,000 and deaths by 71 per 100,000, with an ICER of $7,038 per QALY 6
  • However, official Canadian guidelines have not yet been revised to reflect these findings 5

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not perform upper gastrointestinal evaluation for a positive FIT with negative colonoscopy in the absence of upper GI symptoms 1
  • Do not use dietary restrictions - patients should be explicitly instructed they do not need to adjust diet or medications to complete FIT 1
  • Do not use digital rectal exam samples - FIT programs should rely on spontaneously passed stool specimens 1
  • System barriers are the primary cause of non-adherence, including failure to arrange colonoscopy, failure to inform patients of positive results, and inadequate patient contact 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the evidence.

Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2001

Guideline

Risks of Not Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Modeling the Economic and Health Impact of Lowering the Recommended Colorectal Cancer Screening Age in Canada using Fecal Immunochemical Test versus Colonoscopy.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.