HINTS Test for Vertigo
The HINTS (Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew) examination is a three-part bedside neurological assessment that differentiates central from peripheral causes of acute vestibular syndrome, with greater sensitivity than early MRI for detecting stroke when performed by properly trained clinicians. 1
What HINTS Stands For and Its Purpose
The HINTS examination is specifically designed for patients presenting with Acute Vestibular Syndrome (AVS), characterized by acute, persistent vertigo with nausea/vomiting, head motion intolerance, nystagmus, and gait unsteadiness. 1 This is critical—the test should not be used for intermittent dizziness or patients without nystagmus. 2
The Three Components
1. Head Impulse Test (HI)
- Assesses the vestibulo-ocular reflex by rapidly turning the patient's head while they fixate on a target. 1
- An abnormal response (corrective saccade) suggests peripheral vestibular dysfunction, which is reassuring. 1
- A normal head impulse test in a dizzy patient raises concern for a central (stroke) cause. 1
2. Nystagmus Assessment (N)
- Evaluates the direction and characteristics of involuntary eye movements. 1
- Direction-changing nystagmus (changes direction with gaze) suggests a central cause. 1, 3
- Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus suggests a peripheral cause. 1
- Pure vertical nystagmus strongly indicates a central lesion. 4
3. Test of Skew (TS)
- Detects vertical misalignment of the eyes, suggesting a central lesion. 1
- Performed by covering and uncovering each eye while the patient fixates on a target, looking for vertical correction movements. 1
- Presence of skew deviation indicates a central cause. 1
Interpretation: Central vs. Peripheral
A "central" HINTS examination (concerning for stroke) includes ANY of the following:
- Normal head impulse test (no corrective saccade) 1, 3
- Direction-changing nystagmus 1, 3
- Skew deviation present 1
A "peripheral" HINTS examination (reassuring) includes ALL of the following:
- Abnormal head impulse test (corrective saccade present) 1
- Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus 1
- No skew deviation 1
Diagnostic Accuracy
When performed by trained clinicians, the clinical HINTS examination demonstrates 94.0% sensitivity and 86.9% specificity for identifying central causes of AVS. 5 This makes it more sensitive than early MRI for detecting posterior circulation stroke. 1
The HINTS Plus examination adds assessment of auditory function (hearing loss suggests peripheral labyrinthitis) and shows 95.3% sensitivity and 72.9% specificity. 5
Critical Caveats and Common Pitfalls
Examiner Experience Matters
- Accuracy depends heavily on examiner expertise, with subspecialists achieving higher accuracy than non-subspecialists. 1
- The American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine state that most emergency physicians have not received adequate training to perform HINTS with sufficient accuracy as a first-line test before MRI. 6
- Studies show emergency physicians frequently misapply the test to patients without continuous vertigo or nystagmus, limiting diagnostic value. 2
Patient Selection is Essential
- Only use HINTS for patients with Acute Vestibular Syndrome: acute, persistent (not intermittent) vertigo, nystagmus present, nausea/vomiting, and gait unsteadiness. 1, 2
- Do not use HINTS for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), which requires Dix-Hallpike testing instead. 2
- Up to 25% of AVS cases are caused by stroke, and approximately 75-80% of posterior circulation stroke patients lack focal neurologic deficits on standard examination. 6, 4
When HINTS is Negative but Concern Remains
- A meta-analysis suggests that when HINTS is performed by emergency physicians (not neurologists) in isolation, it is not adequately sensitive to exclude stroke. 6
- Consider MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for patients over 50 years with vascular risk factors, or when severe imbalance is disproportionate to vertigo. 4
- If HINTS suggests a central cause, urgent MRI is indicated, as it is superior to CT for detecting posterior circulation stroke. 7
Terminology Pitfall
Avoid ambiguous documentation like "HINTS negative"—instead use "HINTS central" (concerning for stroke) or "HINTS peripheral" (reassuring for benign cause). 8