Pancreatic Cancer Markers
CA 19-9 is the most useful tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, with elevated levels in approximately 80% of patients with advanced disease, though it should be used primarily for prognosis and monitoring treatment response rather than screening or initial diagnosis. 1
Diagnostic Markers
CA 19-9: The Primary Serum Marker
- CA 19-9 demonstrates 83% sensitivity and serves as the most clinically useful tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, significantly outperforming other markers like CEA 1
- Elevated CA 19-9 (>500 IU/ml) indicates worse prognosis after surgery and should prompt caution regarding immediate surgical intervention 1
- Critical limitation: CA 19-9 is undetectable in patients with Lewis antigen-negative phenotypes (approximately 5-10% of the population), rendering it useless in this subset 1, 2
- CA 19-9 lacks specificity for diagnosis as it can be elevated in benign conditions, particularly cholestasis, making it unreliable as a screening tool 1
- Best clinical use: measuring disease burden and guiding treatment decisions in patients with confirmed pancreatic cancer 1
Other Serum Markers
- CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) shows considerably lower sensitivity than CA 19-9 and is not recommended as a primary marker 1
- CA 125 has limited utility and is not sufficiently sensitive for pancreatic cancer diagnosis 3
Molecular and Genetic Markers
Recommended Molecular Testing
- KRAS and BRCA testing are generally recommended for all patients with pancreatic cancer 1
- For metastatic disease with KRAS wild-type tumors, assess:
- Patients with family history or high-risk features should undergo genetic counseling 1
Actionable Mutations
- BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 mutations indicate potential platinum therapy sensitivity 1
- Rare focal amplifications may contain druggable oncogenes (ERBB2, MET, FGFR1, CDK6, PIK3R3, PIK3CA) though at low individual prevalence 1
Imaging as Diagnostic "Markers"
First-Line Imaging
- Multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT (including late arterial and portal venous phases) is the first-line imaging modality with >90% positive predictive value for determining unresectability 1, 2
- Perform imaging within 4 weeks before starting treatment 1
- If jaundice is present from obstructive head tumor, obtain imaging BEFORE biliary drainage or stenting to avoid artifacts 1
Complementary Imaging
- Abdominal MRI is recommended when CT is inconclusive, contraindicated, or for evaluating cystic lesions 1, 2
- Hepatic MRI before surgery confirms absence of small liver metastases 1
- EUS-guided biopsy is the preferred method for tissue diagnosis with highest accuracy and lowest risk of tumor seeding 2
Imaging to Avoid
- PET-CT is NOT recommended for diagnosis of primary tumors as it cannot reliably differentiate chronic pancreatitis from cancer 1
- PET-CT may be useful for staging localized tumors or when distant metastases are uncertain (doubtful imaging or high CA 19-9) 1
Clinical Application Algorithm
When to Use CA 19-9
- Baseline measurement (if no cholestasis present) for prognostic information 1
- Monitoring during treatment to assess response 1
- Post-operative surveillance every 3 months for 2 years if preoperatively elevated 4
- Decision-making for borderline resectable disease: CA 19-9 >500 IU/ml suggests consideration of neoadjuvant therapy before surgery 1
When NOT to Rely on CA 19-9
- Never use for screening in asymptomatic patients 1
- Interpret with extreme caution in presence of jaundice or cholestasis 1
- Do not use as sole diagnostic criterion—always confirm with imaging 2
- Remember it will be falsely negative in Lewis antigen-negative patients 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never perform percutaneous biopsy of potentially resectable tumors due to peritoneal seeding risk 2
- Do not delay imaging for biliary stenting in jaundiced patients 1
- Avoid over-interpreting elevated CA 19-9 in the setting of biliary obstruction 1
- Do not use PET scanning for primary diagnosis 1
- Cytology or biopsy proof is mandatory before initiating chemotherapy for localized disease, preferably by EUS guidance 1