Is general anesthesia for cesarean section (C-section) safer with the use of video laryngoscopes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Video Laryngoscopy Has Improved Safety of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Videolaryngoscopy should be the first-line intubation device for general anesthesia during cesarean section when a difficult airway is anticipated, as it significantly reduces failed laryngoscopic views and increases first-pass intubation success rates compared to direct laryngoscopy. 1

Evidence for Improved Safety with Videolaryngoscopy

Enhanced Visualization and Success Rates

  • In non-obstetric cases, videolaryngoscopy may well replace direct laryngoscopy as the first choice device in patients with predicted difficult intubation, and these considerations should apply equally to obstetric patients 1

  • Videolaryngoscopy has been used successfully as both a primary technique and as rescue after failure of other approaches in obstetric cases with anticipated difficult airways 1

  • In cases where awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation failed completely, two patients' tracheas were successfully intubated with a videolaryngoscope following induction of general anesthesia 1

Practical Advantages in the Obstetric Setting

  • A pragmatic approach combining videolaryngoscopy during rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia with laryngeal mask use after failed tracheal intubation is recommended over attempting to achieve a 15% awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation rate 1

  • Awake videolaryngoscopy provides equal success rates and complications but shorter intubation times when compared with fibreoptic bronchoscopy in non-obstetric practice 1

  • Videolaryngoscopy is gaining popularity as an awake technique to assess the airway or intubate the trachea in obstetric patients 1

Current Guideline Recommendations

First-Line Use in Anticipated Difficult Airways

  • Videolaryngoscopes are now almost universally available in UK obstetric units and have been suggested as the first-line instrument for routine intubation 1

  • Videolaryngoscopy is likely to be the preferred intubation technique after induction of general anesthesia in women with a predicted difficult airway 1

  • Where possible, videolaryngoscopy should be used for tracheal intubation in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury, with increased first-pass successful intubation rate especially when spinal immobilization is maintained 1

Integration with High-Flow Nasal Oxygen

  • The 2015 OAA/DAS obstetric intubation guidelines advised that high-flow humidified nasal oxygen be considered as a standard technique for procedural oxygenation at induction of general anesthesia, which would be even more applicable for women with a predicted difficult airway 1

  • This combination may make videolaryngoscopy after induction of general anesthesia more acceptable than awake techniques in many cases 1

Critical Caveats and Pitfalls

Training Requirements

  • Clinicians who perform tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways should receive regular training in the use of videolaryngoscopy 1

  • The performance of videolaryngoscopes depends on device type, operator expertise, and patient characteristics—ensure adequate training and familiarity with the specific device 2

Technical Considerations

  • Videolaryngoscopy may be associated with upper airway or laryngeal trauma particularly when a stylet is used during the procedure—exercise caution when advancing the endotracheal tube 2

  • Enhanced laryngeal view does not always guarantee successful tube placement—in one study, endotracheal tube placement failed in 12% of patients despite mostly good laryngeal views 3

  • Do not become fixated on the screen; adopt a "patient-screen-patient" approach and observe tube passage as it enters the oral cavity 4

Backup Planning

  • Have a backup plan ready, including immediate availability of supraglottic airway devices and surgical airway equipment, in case of failed intubation 2

  • If there is a strong likelihood that rescue front-of-neck airway access might be required, perform an ultrasound scan of the neck and mark the cricothyroid membrane before induction 1

Algorithm for Decision-Making

For anticipated difficult airway in cesarean section:

  1. First choice: Awake videolaryngoscopy (faster than fiberoptic bronchoscopy, equal success rates) 1

  2. Alternative if awake technique declined or time-limited: Videolaryngoscopy after induction with high-flow nasal oxygen 1

  3. Rescue after failed videolaryngoscopy: Supraglottic airway device 1

  4. Final rescue: Front-of-neck airway access (pre-marked cricothyroid membrane) 1

For unanticipated difficult airway during cesarean section:

  • Videolaryngoscopy should be the immediate second-line device if Cormack-Lehane grade III or IV is encountered with direct laryngoscopy 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Video Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients Requiring Emergency Intubation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Awake Intubation Using Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Difficult Airways

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.