Have programs like iPLEDGE (Intelligent Pregnancy Prevention and Lifestyle Education with Double Verification and Glucocorticoid-induced Epidermal Differentiation) reduced fetal exposures to isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

iPLEDGE Has Not Significantly Reduced Fetal Exposures to Isotretinoin

Despite the implementation of iPLEDGE and its stringent requirements, fetal exposure to isotretinoin has not significantly decreased, with approximately 150 isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies still occurring annually in the United States. 1

Evidence of Program Ineffectiveness

Direct Comparison Studies

The most rigorous evaluation of iPLEDGE compared to its predecessor program (SMART) found no significant reduction in fetal exposures:

  • In a managed care cohort of 8,344 females of childbearing potential, the rate of fetal exposure decreased only from 3.11 to 2.67 per 1,000 treatment courses after iPLEDGE implementation (P = 0.69), which was not statistically significant. 2

  • The hazard ratio for fetal exposures under iPLEDGE compared to SMART was 0.76 (95% CI 0.36-1.61), indicating no meaningful difference between the two programs. 2

FDA Adverse Event Data

Analysis of FDA reports from 1997-2017 reveals persistent pregnancy exposures despite iPLEDGE:

  • A total of 6,740 pregnancies among women taking isotretinoin were reported to the FDA over this 20-year period. 3

  • Pregnancy reports peaked in 2006 (768 pregnancies) at iPLEDGE initiation, then stabilized to 218-310 annual reports after 2011—still representing substantial ongoing fetal exposures. 3

  • The rate of pregnancy for females of childbearing potential ranged between 0.33% and 0.65%, with the peak occurring in 2006 when iPLEDGE was implemented. 3

Why iPLEDGE Fails

Patient Non-Compliance with Contraception

The fundamental problem is not pregnancy testing frequency but contraceptive failure and non-compliance:

  • Nearly one-third of all women of childbearing potential in a recent US study admitted noncompliance with iPLEDGE pregnancy prevention requirements. 1

  • Of sexually active women, 29% did not comply with the iPLEDGE requirement to use two contraceptive methods or abstain from sex. 1

  • Patient failure to use two contraceptive methods was the most common reason for fetal exposure, even when pregnancy testing was linked to every isotretinoin dispense. 4

Program Design Limitations

Stringent risk management programs like iPLEDGE may increase fear of teratogenic risks without translating into reduced pregnancy rates: 5

  • Linking negative pregnancy tests to isotretinoin dispensing did not reduce fetal exposures in controlled studies. 4

  • The rate of fetal exposure remained essentially unchanged (0.21% before vs 0.23% after) when mandatory pregnancy testing was implemented at Kaiser Permanente. 4

  • Evidence suggests that strenuous regulation alone, without effective contraceptive education and access, does not prevent pregnancies. 5

Clinical Implications

The Persistent Risk

All prescribers and patients must understand that approximately 150 isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies continue to occur annually in the United States despite iPLEDGE. 1 This represents a critical failure of the current system that prioritizes administrative burden over effective contraceptive counseling and access.

Contraceptive Education Over Administrative Requirements

The evidence clearly demonstrates that:

  • Programs must prioritize education about effective contraception while minimizing extraneous requirements to ensure women are not inadvertently undertreated for acne. 5

  • Shared decision-making in contraceptive counseling and education about long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) should be emphasized. 6

  • Prescribers can utilize the reimbursed iPLEDGE contraceptive counseling sessions by referring patients to contraceptive specialists. 6

Potential Improvements

iPLEDGE should recognize variation in contraceptive efficacy—specifically, LARCs and permanent surgical sterilization should be exempt from monthly pregnancy testing and attestations given their superior effectiveness. 6 This would reduce administrative burden while focusing resources on patients using less reliable contraceptive methods.

Common Pitfalls

  • Assuming that more frequent pregnancy testing prevents pregnancies—the evidence shows it does not. 4

  • Believing iPLEDGE has solved the teratogenicity problem—150 annual exposures demonstrate ongoing failure. 1

  • Focusing on administrative compliance rather than effective contraceptive counseling—patient contraceptive non-compliance is the primary cause of fetal exposures. 1, 4

  • Undertreating severe acne due to iPLEDGE burdens—some physicians avoid prescribing isotretinoin entirely due to program requirements, potentially causing harm through inadequate treatment. 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.