Diagnostic Approach for Typhoid Fever
Blood culture is the gold standard for diagnosing typhoid fever and should be obtained immediately in all patients with suspected enteric fever, ideally collecting 2-3 specimens of 20 mL each in adults before starting antibiotics. 1, 2, 3
Clinical Presentation to Recognize
- Fever pattern: Sustained high-grade fever with insidious onset over 3-7 days, present in 97-100% of cases 2, 4
- Key symptoms: Malaise, headache, myalgia, and notably diarrhea is uncommon in enteric fever (which distinguishes it from other infectious diarrheas) 1
- Timing: Suspect typhoid in patients with fever lasting 3-30 days, particularly with travel history to endemic areas 5
- Complications: Abdominal pain and peritonitis typically occur in the third week if untreated, signaling potential intestinal perforation 1
Diagnostic Algorithm
First-Line Testing (Obtain Before Antibiotics)
- Collect 2-3 blood cultures of 20 mL each in adults (larger volumes needed because bacteremia is low at 0.3 CFU/mL) 2, 3
- Highest yield in the first week of symptoms (sensitivity 40-80%) 2, 3
- Sensitivity approximately 50% compared to bone marrow culture 3
- This is the reference standard despite modest sensitivity 4
Second-Line Testing (When Blood Culture Negative or Antibiotics Already Given)
- More sensitive than blood culture, especially if antibiotics have already been administered 1, 2, 3
- Should be reserved for cases where blood cultures remain negative despite high clinical suspicion 3
- In adults, 1 mL bone marrow culture gives similar results to 15 mL blood culture 6
Adjunctive Cultures (Weak Evidence, But May Help)
- Stool culture: May be beneficial as adjunct; culturing 2g rather than 1g increases isolation rate by 10.5% 1, 3, 6
- Duodenal fluid and urine cultures: May provide additional diagnostic yield 1, 2, 3
- Direct plating of blood buffy coat: Can be used where resources are scarce, with 50% sensitivity compared to standard blood culture 6
Molecular Testing (Emerging Role)
- PCR targeting flagellin gene: Shows superior sensitivity (58.2%) compared to blood culture (14.5%) in problematic cases with ambiguous clinical pictures 5
- Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT): Lack sensitivity for detection in blood but may be useful for rapid detection in research settings 3
- Panel-based multiplex molecular diagnostics: Can be used from stool and blood when available, but detect DNA not necessarily viable organisms 2, 3
- Critical caveat: All specimens testing positive by culture-independent methods should be cultured in clinical or public health laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and outbreak detection 3
Tests to AVOID
Serologic tests (including Widal test) should NOT be used 1, 3
- Poor performance characteristics with high false-positive rates (52.7% positive in suspected cases vs 45% in healthy controls) 3, 5
- Sensitivity only 61-64% with specificity 76-100% depending on operator 7
- Displays significant interoperator variability 7
- The IDSA gives this a strong recommendation with moderate evidence 1
Laboratory Findings (Supportive But Non-Specific)
Complete blood count 8
- Leukopenia with relative lymphocytosis (suggests enteric fever over viral fever) 8
- Monocyte predominance (suggests intracellular pathogen like Salmonella) 8
- Thrombocytopenia may be present 8
- CBC alone is insufficient for diagnosis due to non-specific nature 8
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Don't wait for culture results to treat severe cases: Start IV ceftriaxone immediately after obtaining cultures in patients with sepsis, fever ≥38.5°C from endemic areas, or encephalopathy 2
- Don't use small blood volumes: The low magnitude of bacteremia (0.3 CFU/mL) requires 20 mL per culture bottle 2, 3
- Don't rely on serology: Despite widespread use in endemic areas, serologic tests have unacceptable false-positive rates 1, 3, 5
- Don't forget public health reporting: Isolate submission is required for surveillance and outbreak investigation 3
Special Considerations by Clinical Context
If antibiotics already given: Bone marrow culture becomes the preferred specimen 1, 2, 3
In resource-limited settings: Direct buffy coat plating can provide 50% sensitivity when standard culture is unavailable 6, and PCR may offer superior diagnostic yield 5
For children <3 months: Third-generation cephalosporin is recommended empirically while awaiting culture results 2