What are the considerations for using sofosbuvir (Sofosbuvir)-based therapy in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage 5 on hemodialysis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sofosbuvir-Based Therapy in CKD Stage 5 on Hemodialysis

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is the preferred first-line treatment for HCV-infected patients with CKD stage 5 on hemodialysis, but sofosbuvir/velpatasvir can be used safely and effectively when no other relevant treatment options are available. 1

Treatment Hierarchy

First-Line: Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir

  • This is the treatment of choice for CKD stage 4-5 including hemodialysis patients 1
  • Achieves 98-99% SVR12 rates across all HCV genotypes (1-6) in this population 1
  • No dose adjustment required 1
  • Proven efficacy: EXPEDITION-4 trial showed 98% SVR12 (102/104 patients) with CKD stage 4-5 1
  • Japanese multicenter study demonstrated 99% SVR in hemodialysis patients (99/100) 1

Second-Line: Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens

When to Use:

  • When glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is unavailable or contraindicated 1
  • For decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B/C) where protease inhibitors are contraindicated 1

Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Specifics:

  • Can be used with no dose adjustment despite limited safety data 1, 2
  • GS-331007 (sofosbuvir metabolite) exposure increases 20-fold in hemodialysis patients, exceeding levels where adverse reactions occurred in preclinical trials 1
  • Despite this accumulation, a 12-week study of 59 hemodialysis patients showed adverse event and death rates were not higher than expected 1
  • Multiple real-world studies confirm safety and efficacy 1, 3, 4

Critical Safety Considerations

Renal Pharmacokinetics

  • Sofosbuvir is eliminated primarily by renal route 1, 2
  • In ESRD patients, sofosbuvir AUC increases 28-60% and GS-331007 AUC increases 1280-2070% depending on dialysis timing 2
  • Hemodialysis removes only approximately 18% of administered dose 2
  • Despite accumulation, full-dose sofosbuvir (400 mg daily) has been used safely 5, 3, 6, 4

Monitoring Requirements

  • Treat in expert centers with multidisciplinary team monitoring 1
  • Monitor serum potassium closely—recurrent hyperkalemia occurs in approximately 30% of patients (10/33 in one study) 7
  • Check potassium every 4 weeks or on demand during treatment 7
  • Monitor renal function and electrolytes, particularly if severe gastrointestinal symptoms develop 7
  • No clinically meaningful changes in eGFR or serum creatinine have been reported post-treatment 4

Cardiovascular Safety

  • No increased risk for cardiac adverse events has been demonstrated in real-world practice 3
  • Adverse event rates comparable to expected baseline in ESRD population 1

Dosing Strategies

Full-Dose Approach (Preferred)

  • Sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily with NS5A inhibitor (daclatasvir or ledipasvir) for 12 weeks 5, 6
  • Achieves 100% SVR12 in multiple studies 5, 6
  • Meta-analysis shows no significant difference in SVR12 (97.1% vs 96.2%, p=0.72) or SAE rate (8.8% vs 2.9%, p=0.13) between full and reduced doses 4

Reduced-Dose Approach (Alternative)

  • Some centers use sofosbuvir 200 mg or 3 times weekly 6, 4
  • Two relapses occurred with 3-times-weekly regimen vs. none with daily dosing in one study 6
  • Daily dosing is recommended over intermittent dosing 6

Ribavirin Considerations

  • Avoid ribavirin in severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) 1
  • If used, dose at 200 mg/day only if hemoglobin >10 g/dL at baseline 1
  • Requires frequent hemoglobin monitoring; interrupt if hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL 1
  • Erythropoietin and blood transfusion may be necessary 1
  • When ribavirin cannot be used, extend treatment to 24 weeks 1

Alternative Regimens for Specific Genotypes

Genotype 1b

  • Grazoprevir/elbasvir for 12 weeks without ribavirin achieves 92-94% SVR12 1
  • C-SURFER trial: 92% SVR12 (54/59) in CKD stage 4-5 patients 1

Genotype 1a

  • Grazoprevir/elbasvir with ribavirin 200 mg daily (if hemoglobin >10 g/dL) 1
  • Ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir with ribavirin 200 mg daily 1

Timing of Treatment

Pre- vs. Post-Transplant Decision Algorithm

  • Treat all hemodialysis patients who are transplant candidates 1
  • HCV-associated liver damage accelerates with immunosuppression 1
  • Consider: donor type (living vs. deceased), waiting list times, center policies on HCV-positive donors, HCV genotype, and liver fibrosis severity 1
  • If receiving kidney from HCV RNA-positive donor increases transplant likelihood, transplant first and treat HCV post-transplant 1
  • High efficacy and safety demonstrated in kidney transplant recipients 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not withhold sofosbuvir-based therapy solely due to ESRD—multiple studies confirm safety when glecaprevir/pibrentasvir unavailable 1, 3, 4
  2. Do not use reduced-dose sofosbuvir intermittently (3 times weekly)—higher relapse rates observed 6
  3. Do not add ribavirin routinely in ESRD—high risk of severe anemia 1
  4. Do not use protease inhibitors in decompensated cirrhosis with CKD—contraindicated 1
  5. Do not neglect potassium monitoring—hyperkalemia recurrence is common 7

Evidence Quality Note

The 2020 EASL guidelines represent the most recent high-quality evidence, superseding the 2017 recommendations that advised caution with sofosbuvir in severe renal impairment 1. The updated guidance reflects accumulating real-world data demonstrating safety and efficacy 3, 4. The FDA label acknowledges limited safety data but permits use when no other options available 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.