What is an effective tool in assessing surgery residents' mental health status?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Effective Tools for Assessing Surgery Residents' Mental Health Status

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with a cutoff score of ≥8 is the recommended validated screening tool for detecting depression in medical populations, including surgery residents, and should be combined with systematic assessment of burnout using the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory. 1, 2

Primary Screening Approach

Depression Screening

  • Implement the 2-item PHQ-9 as first-line screening, assessing low mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks; if either item scores ≥2, complete the full 9-item questionnaire 1
  • The PHQ-9 with cutoff ≥8 has been validated specifically for detecting depression in medical populations and is practical for routine use 1
  • A score of 10 or greater on the PHQ-9 meets criteria for clinical depression and warrants immediate intervention 3

Burnout Assessment

  • Use the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess burnout, which measures two critical dimensions: emotional exhaustion and depersonalization 2
  • This tool identified 69% burnout prevalence among 566 surgical residents across training levels, demonstrating its sensitivity in this population 2
  • Burnout assessment should be routine, as 75% of general surgery residents meet criteria for burnout in recent studies 3

Comprehensive Mental Status Components

Core Assessment Elements

  • Systematically evaluate mood state, anxiety level, thought content and process, and suicidal ideation as essential components of mental health screening 1, 4
  • Assessment for hopelessness is crucial, as it carries significant clinical implications for risk stratification 1
  • Direct evaluation for suicidal ideation must include both active and passive thoughts of suicide or death, with 12% of residents reporting suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks 1, 3

Additional Validated Tools

  • The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) effectively measures stress levels, with surgery residents scoring significantly higher than normative populations (21% above 90th percentile) 5
  • The Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) provides comprehensive assessment of psychological distress, with 38% of surgery residents scoring above the 90th percentile compared to societal controls 5

Risk Stratification and Protective Factors

High-Risk Indicators Requiring Immediate Action

  • High burnout is strongly associated with depression (OR 4.8), suicidal ideation (OR 5.7), and severe stress (OR 7.8), necessitating urgent mental health professional evaluation 2
  • Persistent suicidal ideation, severe hopelessness, or inability to be adequately monitored require consideration for immediate psychiatric consultation 6
  • Junior residents (PGY 1-3) demonstrate higher anxiety, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and interpersonal sensitivity compared to senior residents 5

Protective Factors

  • Higher dispositional mindfulness is associated with dramatically lower risk: burnout (OR 0.24), stress (OR 0.15), anxiety (OR 0.21), suicidal ideation (OR 0.25), and depression (OR 0.26) 2
  • Assessment of psychological safety in the workplace correlates with flourishing and reduced languishing among residents 7

Implementation Strategy

Screening Frequency and Context

  • Conduct routine screening at multiple time points throughout training, as psychological distress remains high across all training levels with some improvement during research years 2
  • Integrate screening into existing wellness programs rather than implementing as standalone "band-aid" interventions 7

Barriers to Address

  • The top three barriers to seeking care are: inability to take time off for treatment (identified by 90% of residents), avoidance/denial of the problem, and negative stigma toward those seeking care 3
  • Both residents and attendings significantly underestimate the true prevalence of depression (51% and 75% respectively underestimated), highlighting the need for education alongside screening 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on symptom counts when assessing depression; incorporate risk factors, functional impairment, and collateral information 1
  • Never omit assessment of suicidal ideation—this is a required component and 9 of 77 residents (12%) reported suicidal ideation in recent studies 1, 3
  • Avoid attributing all distress to "normal" training stress; 38% of surgery residents meet criteria for clinical psychological distress requiring intervention 5
  • Do not assume attendings accurately perceive resident mental health status; only 23% of attendings correctly estimated burnout prevalence compared to 53% of residents 3
  • Recognize that mental health disorders significantly impact surgical outcomes, including increased complications, readmissions, and mortality, making screening a patient safety issue 8

When to Escalate Care

  • Immediate mental health professional evaluation is required for: PHQ-9 score ≥10, active suicidal ideation, severe hopelessness, or high burnout with depression 1, 6, 3
  • Safety takes precedence over confidentiality when a resident is at imminent risk of self-harm 6
  • Arrange same-day psychiatric evaluation for moderate to high suicide risk, with options including hospitalization, emergency department transfer, or urgent outpatient appointment 6

References

Guideline

Assessment and Treatment of Mood and Thought Disorders

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Brief Mental Status Examination Components

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Suicidal Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.