What is the diagnostic approach for osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Approach for Osteoporosis

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, with diagnosis based on WHO criteria: T-score ≤ -2.5 indicates osteoporosis, T-score between -1.0 and -2.4 indicates osteopenia, and T-score > -1.0 is normal. 1, 2

Who Should Be Screened

Women

  • All women age 65 years and older 1
  • Women younger than 65 years with risk factors including: estrogen deficiency, maternal hip fracture after age 50, low body weight (<127 lb or 57.6 kg), history of amenorrhea (>1 year before age 42), current smoking, or loss of height/thoracic kyphosis 1

Men

  • Men age 70 years and older 1
  • Men younger than 70 years with risk factors including: age >70 years, low BMI (<20-25 kg/m²), weight loss (>10%), physical inactivity, oral corticosteroid use, androgen deprivation therapy, or previous fragility fracture 1

Universal Indications (Any Age, Either Sex)

  • Individuals with bone mass osteopenia or fragility fractures on imaging (radiographs, CT, or MRI) 1
  • Anyone age 50+ who develops wrist, hip, spine, or proximal humerus fracture with minimal/no trauma 1
  • Anyone with one or more insufficiency fractures 1
  • Monitoring effectiveness of osteoporosis drug therapy 1

Diagnostic Testing Algorithm

Step 1: DXA Bone Densitometry

  • Primary sites: Measure BMD at proximal femur (hip) and lumbar spine 1, 2
  • Interpretation using T-scores (for postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years): 1
    • Normal: T-score > -1.0
    • Osteopenia: T-score -1.0 to -2.4
    • Osteoporosis: T-score ≤ -2.5
  • Z-scores should be used for premenopausal women, men <50 years, and children 3
  • DXA has 90-95% sensitivity for detecting osteoporosis 2

Step 2: Fracture Risk Assessment (for Osteopenia)

  • For patients with T-scores between -1.0 and -2.4, use FRAX tool to calculate 10-year fracture probability 1, 4
  • FRAX factors: hip BMD, age, gender, height, weight, family history of hip fracture, smoking, steroid use >3 months, rheumatoid arthritis, alcohol use 1
  • Treatment thresholds: 10-year probability of hip fracture ≥3% OR 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% 1

Step 3: Essential Laboratory Evaluation

All patients with suspected or confirmed osteoporosis require laboratory testing to exclude secondary causes (present in 32-85% of cases): 2

  • Complete blood count (CBC) 2
  • Serum calcium 2
  • Serum phosphorus 2
  • Serum creatinine 2
  • Alkaline phosphatase 2
  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] 2
  • Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) 2
  • Parathyroid hormone (PTH) 2

This panel has 92% sensitivity for detecting secondary causes of osteoporosis. 2

Step 4: Sex-Specific Testing

  • Men: Assess for hypogonadism (testosterone levels) 2
  • Premenopausal women: Evaluate for clinical estrogen deficiency or primary ovarian failure 2

Step 5: Additional Testing Based on Clinical Suspicion

  • Suspected multiple myeloma: Serum protein electrophoresis (80-90% sensitivity) 2
  • Suspected malabsorption: Tissue transglutaminase antibodies for celiac disease (90-95% sensitivity) 2
  • Suspected Cushing's syndrome: Cortisol testing (95-100% sensitivity) 2

Step 6: Vertebral Fracture Assessment

  • Review previous imaging studies (spine radiographs, CT, MRI) to identify missed vertebral fractures (80-90% sensitivity) 2
  • Consider plain radiographs of thoracic/lumbar spine or DXA with vertebral fracture assessment software in patients with osteopenia and height loss 2

Alternative Screening Tests (Limited Role)

Calcaneal Ultrasonography

  • At T-score threshold of -1.0: 75% sensitivity, 66% specificity for DXA-determined osteoporosis 1
  • Not sufficiently sensitive or specific to replace DXA for diagnosis 1
  • May predict fractures independently but treatment trials have not established effectiveness of therapy based on ultrasonography diagnosis 1

Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST)

  • Formula: (weight in kg - age in years) × 0.2 1
  • At risk score of -1: 81% sensitivity, 68% specificity for DXA-determined osteoporosis 1
  • Not recommended as substitute for DXA 1

Quantitative CT (QCT)

  • Provides volumetric BMD (vs. areal BMD from DXA) 1
  • WHO T-scores do not apply to QCT 1
  • ACR defines osteopenia as 80-120 mg/mL and osteoporosis as <80 mg/mL 1
  • More expensive and less widely available than DXA 1

Follow-Up Testing Intervals

  • If initial DXA does not warrant treatment: Repeat every 2-5 years depending on proximity to treatment thresholds 2
  • Patients on bone loss-inducing medications or baseline BMD near treatment threshold: DXA every 2 years or more frequently if medically necessary 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't miss secondary causes: Most common include hypogonadism and glucocorticoid exposure in men; estrogen deficiency and glucocorticoid exposure in premenopausal women 2
  • Don't overlook vitamin D deficiency: Present in 32-85% of osteoporotic patients; causes osteomalacia with bone pain, muscle weakness, and stiffness 2
  • Don't use T-scores in wrong populations: Use Z-scores for premenopausal women, men <50 years, and children 3
  • Don't rely on alternative tests alone: Calcaneal ultrasonography and OST are not sufficiently accurate to replace DXA for diagnosis 1
  • Don't forget vertebral fracture assessment: Up to 80% of vertebral fractures are clinically silent 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Diagnostic Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Classification of Osteoporosis.

Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023

Research

[Diagnostic approach to osteoporosis].

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2009

Research

[Clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Przeglad lekarski, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.