Does a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) with less than 70% accurate readings suggest the patient removed the unit for periods of time?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Understanding Less Than 70% Accurate Readings on ABPM

Less than 70% accurate readings on ABPM does not necessarily mean the patient removed the unit, but rather indicates that insufficient valid measurements were obtained to meet quality standards for reliable interpretation. 1

Why the 70% Threshold Matters

At least 70% of blood pressure readings during both daytime and nighttime periods must be satisfactory for the monitoring to be considered interpretable, or else the study should be repeated. 1 The most recent 2024 ESC guidelines specify this requires typically ≥27 measurements over 24 hours, with preferably seven nocturnal readings obtained. 1

Common Causes of Failed Readings (Beyond Device Removal)

The 67% success rate in your patient's study could result from multiple technical factors:

  • Movement artifact - The most common cause of failed readings, particularly during arm movement or physical activity 1, 2
  • Improper cuff positioning - Cuff slippage or kinks in the tubing during normal activities 1
  • Patient cancellation of readings - Using the cancellation button when the cuff inflates at inconvenient times 1
  • Excessive physical activity - Readings during vigorous exercise or contact sports often fail 1
  • Irregular cardiac rhythm - Readings may not be accurate when cardiac rhythm is markedly irregular 1
  • Technical device issues - Dead batteries, device malfunction, or the patient turning the monitor off 1

Interpreting Your Patient's Results Despite Limited Data

Your patient's study shows:

  • 24-hour average: 125/75 mmHg
  • Daytime average: 128/73 mmHg
  • Nocturnal average: 118/64 mmHg

These values fall below the 2024 ESC hypertension thresholds (24-hour ≥130/80 mmHg, daytime ≥135/85 mmHg, nighttime ≥120/70 mmHg), suggesting normal blood pressure. 1 However, because only 67% of readings were valid, this study should be repeated to ensure reliable interpretation. 1, 3

Practical Next Steps

Review the patient diary (if completed) to identify specific times when readings failed - this will clarify whether the issue was device removal versus technical failures during specific activities. 1, 3

Before repeating the study, provide enhanced patient education focusing on:

  • Keeping the arm still and at heart level during cuff inflation 1
  • Avoiding strenuous exercise or contact sports during monitoring 1
  • Not using the cancellation button unless absolutely necessary 1
  • Ensuring the device remains properly positioned throughout the 24-hour period 1
  • Verifying the cuff is not kinked or twisted 1

Schedule a repeat ABPM with more frequent measurement intervals (every 20 minutes throughout both day and night) to increase the likelihood of obtaining ≥70% valid readings. 1

Critical Caveat

If the patient has atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular cardiac rhythms, oscillometric ABPM may inherently produce unreliable readings regardless of proper technique. 1 In such cases, alternative blood pressure assessment methods should be considered.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Interpreting Ambulatory Blood Pressure Records

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.