Glutathione Dosing for Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Administration
Based on available clinical evidence, glutathione for IM administration is dosed at 600 mg daily (typically on days 2-5 following IV administration), though this route has limited supporting data and is not FDA-approved for any indication in the United States. 1
Evidence-Based Dosing from Clinical Trials
Intramuscular Administration
- 600 mg IM daily was used in a randomized controlled trial for prevention of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity, administered on days 2-5 following initial IV dosing 1
- This represents the only well-documented IM dosing regimen in peer-reviewed literature 1
- The IM route was used as adjunctive therapy following primary IV administration at 1.5 g/m² 1
Subcutaneous Administration
- No established dosing protocols exist for SC administration of glutathione in clinical guidelines or high-quality research 2
- The evidence base does not support SC administration as a validated route 2
Critical Context: Intravenous Dosing (Primary Route)
Since IM/SC dosing is poorly established, understanding IV protocols is essential:
Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy Prevention
- 1,500 mg/m² IV over 15 minutes immediately before chemotherapy administration 2, 1
- Alternative dosing: 2.5 g IV over 15 minutes before cisplatin 2
- This represents the most robust evidence base for glutathione administration 2
Peripheral Artery Disease
- Dosing not specified in evidence, but administered IV twice daily for 5 days in clinical trials 3
Parkinson's Disease (Empirical Use)
- Dosing varies widely in case reports, with no standardized protocol 4
- This represents off-label, empirical use without guideline support 4
Pharmacokinetic Considerations
Glutathione has extremely rapid elimination kinetics that fundamentally limit the utility of IM/SC routes:
- Half-life: 11.4 to 52.4 minutes depending on dose, with higher doses eliminated faster 5
- Plasma clearance: 0.84 to 2.44 mL/min with dose-dependent increases 5
- Rapid oxidation in plasma is the primary elimination mechanism, not tissue extraction 5
- The body tightly regulates plasma GSH levels within narrow physiological limits 5
These pharmacokinetics explain why IV bolus administration is preferred - the rapid elimination makes sustained therapeutic levels from IM/SC injection highly unlikely 5
Critical Safety and Regulatory Warnings
Lack of FDA Approval
- Glutathione is NOT FDA-approved for any indication via any route of administration 2
- All clinical use represents off-label prescribing based on research protocols 2, 1
Route-Specific Concerns
- IM injection technique matters: Use 22-25 gauge, 1-1½ inch needle at 90-degree angle into deltoid, anterolateral thigh, or ventrogluteal area 6
- Site rotation is mandatory to prevent tissue damage and ensure proper absorption 6
- SC administration lacks any safety or efficacy data in peer-reviewed literature 2
Monitoring Requirements
- No established monitoring protocols exist for IM/SC glutathione administration 2
- IV protocols suggest monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions, though specific parameters are not defined 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Assuming IM/SC routes are equivalent to IV administration - the pharmacokinetics strongly suggest they are not 5
Using glutathione without addressing the underlying condition - evidence supports its use as adjunctive therapy, not monotherapy 1
Failing to recognize this is entirely off-label use - there are no FDA-approved indications for glutathione by any route 2
Expecting sustained plasma levels from IM/SC injection - the 11-52 minute half-life makes this pharmacologically implausible 5
Not rotating injection sites - repeated IM injections at the same site cause tissue damage and unpredictable absorption 6
Clinical Decision Algorithm
If considering glutathione administration:
Verify the indication - only chemotherapy-induced neuropathy prevention has Level Ib evidence 2
Choose IV route preferentially - this is the only route with substantial clinical evidence 2, 1
If IM must be used (e.g., lack of IV access):
Avoid SC route entirely - no evidence base exists 2
Counsel patients that this represents off-label use without FDA approval 2