Are CPT codes 61624, 36216, 36217, and 36218, and inpatient admission, considered medically necessary for a patient with a history of ruptured left Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) terminus aneurysm, status post (s/p) coil embolization, who has recanalization of the left ICA terminus aneurysm and symptoms of extreme fatigue?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity of Endovascular Recanalization for Recurrent ICA Terminus Aneurysm

Yes, CPT codes 61624 (transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization), 36216,36217,36218 (selective catheter placement), and inpatient admission are medically necessary for this patient with documented recanalization of a previously coiled ruptured ICA terminus aneurysm, particularly given the presence of concerning neurological symptoms (extreme fatigue with episodes of falling asleep while driving). 1

Primary Justification for Medical Necessity

The presence of aneurysm recanalization after prior coil embolization of a ruptured aneurysm represents a high-risk scenario requiring definitive treatment. 1 The American Heart Association guidelines specifically note that recurrent or residual aneurysms after initial treatment carry significant risk for re-rupture, with incomplete obliteration rates as high as 46% after coil embolization and documented higher recurrence rates in incompletely treated lesions. 1

Key Clinical Factors Supporting Intervention:

  • Prior rupture history: This patient has already experienced subarachnoid hemorrhage from this aneurysm, placing them in a fundamentally different risk category than patients with unruptured aneurysms. 1

  • Documented recanalization: DSA imaging confirms "slight interval recanalization" of the left ICA terminus aneurysm, indicating treatment failure and restoration of blood flow into the aneurysm sac. 1

  • Symptomatic presentation: The extreme fatigue with falling asleep while driving, though not classic focal neurological symptoms, represents concerning neurological changes that warrant investigation and may indicate compromised cerebral perfusion or other aneurysm-related effects. 1

Endovascular Approach Appropriateness

Flow diversion stenting (FDS) with embolization is an appropriate treatment modality for recurrent ICA terminus aneurysms. 1 The guidelines support catheter-directed endovascular intervention including embolization, stent placement, and flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment. 1

Advantages of endovascular re-treatment:

  • Lower morbidity than repeat craniotomy: For previously treated aneurysms, endovascular approaches typically carry lower procedural risk than surgical clipping, particularly in the setting of prior intervention. 1

  • Appropriate for ICA terminus location: The ICA terminus/bifurcation location is accessible via endovascular techniques and represents a standard indication for catheter-based intervention. 1

  • Flow diversion addresses recanalization: FDS specifically addresses the mechanism of recanalization by redirecting flow away from the aneurysm sac while maintaining parent vessel patency. 1

CPT Code Justification

CPT 61624 (transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization of intracranial vessels) is appropriate for the flow diversion stenting and coiling procedure. 1

CPT 36216,36217,36218 (selective catheter placement in arterial system) are necessary and appropriate for navigating to the ICA terminus, as these codes represent the technical work of accessing the target vessel through the aortic arch and cervical carotid system. 1

Inpatient Admission Justification

Inpatient admission is medically necessary for this procedure despite MCG guidelines suggesting ambulatory status. 1 Several factors override the ambulatory recommendation:

  • Intracranial intervention risk: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms requires post-procedural neurological monitoring for potential complications including thromboembolism, vessel perforation, or hemorrhage. 1

  • Prior rupture history: Patients with previously ruptured aneurysms undergoing re-treatment require closer observation than those with unruptured aneurysms. 1

  • Antiplatelet management: Flow diversion stenting requires dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel for minimum 30 days), and the immediate post-procedural period requires monitoring for bleeding complications while maintaining adequate antiplatelet effect. 1

  • Blood pressure management: Strict blood pressure control is required before and after the procedure to prevent aneurysm rupture or hyperperfusion complications. 1

  • Neurological assessment: Clinical neurological examination must be documented within 24 hours before and after the procedure, necessitating inpatient observation. 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not delay treatment based on MCG ambulatory recommendations for this specific clinical scenario. 1 While some endovascular procedures can be performed in ambulatory settings, the combination of prior rupture, recanalization, and intracranial location creates a higher-risk profile requiring inpatient care.

Ensure embolic protection device deployment during the procedure when feasible to reduce stroke risk. 1 The guidelines recommend EPD use when vascular injury risk is low.

Verify adequate antiplatelet therapy is established before the procedure. 1 Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (81-325 mg daily) plus clopidogrel (75 mg daily) should be administered before and for minimum 30 days after the procedure.

Post-Procedure Surveillance

Non-invasive imaging at 1 month, 6 months, and annually after revascularization is recommended to assess patency and exclude new lesions. 1 This is particularly important given the history of recanalization after initial treatment.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.