Was the inpatient stay for diagnosis of other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbosacral region with discogenic back pain only (M51.370), medically necessary?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Assessment: Inpatient Stay for Discogenic Back Pain (M51.370)

The inpatient stay for diagnosis M51.370 (intervertebral disc degeneration with discogenic back pain only) from [DATE]-[DATE] was NOT medically necessary based on the clinical documentation provided and established guidelines.

Critical Analysis of the Case

Diagnosis Code Mismatch

  • The utilization review question asks about M51.370 (disc degeneration with discogenic back pain only), but the actual admission diagnoses were M48.062 (spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication), M41.9 (scoliosis), and M47.26 (spondylosis with radiculopathy) 1
  • The patient underwent Stage 2 of a complex T9-pelvis fusion with L1-L2 interbody fusion and SI fusion for progressive idiopathic scoliosis, not isolated discogenic pain 1
  • Discogenic pain alone does not meet criteria for inpatient admission or surgical intervention 1

MCG Criteria Application

According to MCG Back Pain guidelines (29th Edition), admission is indicated only for:

  • Severe pain requiring acute inpatient management with palliative procedures necessitating inpatient monitoring 1
  • Etiology requiring inpatient treatment such as aortic dissection, epidural abscess, or spinal instability 1

Goal length of stay is 2 days for appropriate admissions 1

Clinical Documentation Review

What Was Actually Treated

  • The patient had progressive idiopathic scoliosis with spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication requiring staged complex fusion surgery 1
  • Stage 1 was performed [DATE], followed by Stage 2 on [DATE] 1
  • Post-operative complications included ileus, acute urinary retention, and DVT requiring extended monitoring 1

Why M51.370 Does Not Apply

  • Disc degeneration is extremely common in asymptomatic individuals and does not correlate with pain severity 2, 3
  • MRI findings of disc degeneration are present in 29-43% of asymptomatic people depending on age 1
  • Disc degeneration alone is not an indication for surgery or inpatient admission 1
  • The Journal of Neurosurgery guidelines emphasize that MRI is very sensitive for detecting disc changes but not specific for identifying pain sources 2

Evidence-Based Standards for Discogenic Pain

Diagnostic Requirements

  • Discogenic pain requires concordant pain provocation on discography to establish diagnosis, not just MRI findings 1
  • MRI has 92% positive predictive value for morphological abnormalities but does not confirm pain source 1
  • The presence of disc degeneration on imaging does not establish it as the pain generator 3, 4, 5

Treatment Indications

  • Conservative management is first-line for discogenic pain: physical therapy, NSAIDs, and potentially facet injections 6
  • Surgery for isolated discogenic pain has limited efficacy and is not standard of care 3
  • The American College of Radiology recommends against routine imaging for acute uncomplicated low back pain 1

Medical Necessity Determination

Why This Stay Does Not Meet Criteria for M51.370

  1. Wrong diagnosis code: The patient was admitted for complex scoliosis surgery, not discogenic pain management 1

  2. No documentation of discogenic pain as primary indication: Clinical notes describe scoliosis, stenosis, and radiculopathy—not isolated disc degeneration pain 1

  3. Exceeds goal length of stay: MCG recommends 2-day stay; previous admission was already certified for 8 days [DATE]-[DATE] 1

  4. Missing clinical documentation: No records available for [DATE] per utilization review 1

  5. Disc degeneration findings are incidental: The L4-S1 anterior fusion was part of comprehensive scoliosis correction, not treatment of discogenic pain 1

Common Pitfalls in This Case

  • Conflating surgical diagnosis with medical necessity diagnosis: The presence of disc degeneration at surgical levels does not make it the indication for admission 2, 3
  • Retrospective diagnosis coding: M51.370 appears to be applied retrospectively rather than being the actual admission diagnosis 1
  • Ignoring established guidelines: ACR Appropriateness Criteria state imaging abnormalities are common in asymptomatic patients and do not justify intervention 1

Recommendation

The inpatient stay should be certified under the original diagnoses (M48.062, M41.9, M47.26) for complex scoliosis surgery with complications, NOT under M51.370 for discogenic pain. The actual clinical scenario—staged fusion for progressive scoliosis with neurogenic claudication—meets medical necessity criteria, but isolated disc degeneration with discogenic pain does not justify this level of care 1, 2.

The utilization reviewer correctly identified that goal length of stay is 2 days only and that the request exceeds recommended stay, though the extended stay was justified by post-operative complications (ileus, DVT) rather than the disc degeneration diagnosis 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Degenerative Disc Disease Explanation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pathology and possible mechanisms of nervous system response to disc degeneration.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2006

Guideline

Management of Glycosuria and Lumbar Spine Pathology

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.