What is the diagnosis for a patient with epigastric pain, fullness, and an exophytic swelling on CT (Computed Tomography) scan without weight loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis: GIST (Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor)

The most likely diagnosis is GIST (option A), given the characteristic presentation of an exophytic swelling on CT in a patient with epigastric pain and fullness without weight loss. 1

Key Diagnostic Features Supporting GIST

Exophytic Growth Pattern

  • GISTs characteristically arise from the muscularis propria of the gastric wall and most commonly manifest as exophytic masses that grow outward from the organ of origin 1
  • This exophytic pattern is the dominant radiologic manifestation of GISTs, distinguishing them from intramural or intraluminal masses 1
  • The stomach is the most common primary site for GIST (60-70% of cases), followed by small intestine (25-30%) 2, 3

Clinical Presentation Matches GIST Profile

  • Abdominal/epigastric pain is the most prevalent symptom in GIST patients 3
  • Fullness or abdominal distension is commonly reported with larger GISTs 4
  • The absence of weight loss does not exclude GIST—many patients present with localized symptoms without constitutional signs 2
  • GISTs can be asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms like pain and fullness 2

Why Other Options Are Less Likely

Leiomyoma (Option C)

  • Leiomyomas are now understood to be rare in the GI tract since the recognition of GISTs as a distinct entity 1
  • GISTs were historically misclassified as leiomyomas before CD117 (KIT) immunohistochemistry became available to distinguish them 1
  • True leiomyomas lack CD117 expression, which is present in >95% of GISTs 5, 2

Leiomyosarcoma (Option B)

  • Leiomyosarcomas are also now recognized as distinct from GISTs and are much rarer 1
  • The clinical presentation and exophytic pattern on CT are more consistent with GIST than leiomyosarcoma 1

Lymphoma (Option D)

  • Gastric lymphoma typically presents with diffuse wall thickening rather than an exophytic mass 6
  • Lymphoma more commonly causes constitutional symptoms including weight loss, which is absent in this case 6
  • The imaging pattern described (exophytic swelling) is atypical for lymphoma

Diagnostic Confirmation Required

Imaging Characteristics to Assess

  • GISTs characteristically show hemorrhage, necrosis, or cyst formation appearing as focal areas of low attenuation on CT 1
  • Large GISTs (>5 cm) often demonstrate heterogeneous enhancement with cystic or necrotic components 1, 4

Definitive Diagnosis

  • Endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRI) constitute the diagnostic workup 2
  • Histopathological confirmation with CD117 (KIT) immunohistochemistry is essential—approximately 95% of GISTs are CD117-positive 5, 2
  • Mutational analysis (c-KIT or PDGFRA genes) should be performed when planning treatment, as 80-90% carry these mutations 5

Clinical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not dismiss GIST based on absence of weight loss or bleeding—while GI bleeding is a common presentation, many patients present with nonspecific abdominal pain and fullness alone, particularly with exophytic tumors that grow outward rather than into the lumen 2, 3, 4

References

Research

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: radiologic features with pathologic correlation.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2003

Research

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multidisciplinary challenge.

World journal of gastroenterology, 2018

Guideline

Gastric Wall Thickening: Diagnostic Approach and Complications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.