What are the recommended tests and treatment for serological diagnosis of neurosyphilis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Serological Testing for Neurosyphilis

Direct Diagnostic Recommendation

For neurosyphilis diagnosis, perform CSF examination with VDRL-CSF as the standard test, combined with CSF white blood cell count and protein analysis—no single test is sufficient, and diagnosis requires the combination of reactive VDRL-CSF (highly specific when positive) plus elevated CSF WBC >5-10 cells/mm³, along with reactive serum treponemal tests. 1, 2, 3

Diagnostic Algorithm

When to Perform CSF Examination

Obtain CSF in patients with:

  • Neurologic or ocular symptoms/signs 3
  • Active tertiary syphilis 3
  • Treatment failure for non-neurologic syphilis 3
  • HIV-infected patients with late-latent syphilis or syphilis of unknown duration 3

CSF Testing Panel

Perform the following tests on cerebrospinal fluid:

1. VDRL-CSF (Standard Test)

  • This is the gold standard serologic test for CSF 1, 4, 3
  • Reactive VDRL-CSF is diagnostic of neurosyphilis when there is no significant blood contamination 1, 4
  • Sensitivity: 49-87% (meaning it can be negative even when neurosyphilis is present) 4
  • Specificity: 74-100% (highly specific—false positives are rare) 4
  • A negative VDRL-CSF does NOT exclude neurosyphilis 4

2. CSF White Blood Cell Count

  • Elevation >5 cells/mm³ (some sources use >10 cells/mm³) is typically present in neurosyphilis 1, 4, 3
  • This is the most sensitive measure of disease activity and treatment effectiveness 1, 4
  • Reactive VDRL-CSF plus CSF WBC >10 cells/µL strongly supports neurosyphilis diagnosis 3

3. CSF Protein

  • Usually elevated or mildly elevated in neurosyphilis 3
  • Less specific than WBC count but contributes to overall diagnostic picture 3

4. Optional: CSF Treponemal Tests (FTA-ABS)

  • Highly sensitive (95% pooled sensitivity) but less specific than VDRL-CSF 1, 4, 5
  • A negative CSF FTA-ABS effectively excludes neurosyphilis according to some experts 1, 3
  • A positive result does not confirm neurosyphilis due to lower specificity 3
  • Pooled specificity: 85% 5

Serum Testing (Complementary, Not Diagnostic for Neurosyphilis)

Always perform both nontreponemal and treponemal tests on serum:

  • Nontreponemal tests (VDRL or RPR): Monitor disease activity quantitatively 1, 2
  • Treponemal tests (FTA-ABS or TP-PA): Confirm treponemal infection 2
  • Serum tests alone cannot diagnose or exclude neurosyphilis 4

Diagnostic Interpretation

Diagnostic Criteria for Neurosyphilis

Neurosyphilis is diagnosed when you have:

  • Reactive VDRL-CSF (without blood contamination) 1, 4, 3
  • PLUS elevated CSF WBC >5-10 cells/mm³ 1, 3
  • PLUS reactive serum treponemal test 1, 2
  • With or without clinical neurologic manifestations 1

Alternative Diagnostic Patterns

If VDRL-CSF is negative but clinical suspicion remains high:

  • Elevated CSF WBC >10 cells/mm³ with reactive serum tests suggests possible neurosyphilis 3
  • Consider CSF FTA-ABS—if negative, neurosyphilis is unlikely 1, 3
  • Elevated CSF protein supports the diagnosis but is not specific 3

Test Performance Comparison

Recent meta-analysis data shows:

  • Nontreponemal CSF tests (VDRL, RPR, TRUST): 77% sensitivity, 99% specificity 5
  • Treponemal CSF tests: 95% sensitivity, 85% specificity 5
  • TRUST may be a satisfactory substitute for VDRL with higher sensitivity (83% vs 77%) 5
  • EIA (enzyme immunoassay) shows promising performance: 99% sensitivity, 98% specificity 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Blood Contamination

  • Blood contamination during lumbar puncture can cause false-positive VDRL-CSF results 1, 4
  • Ensure proper technique and note any visible blood in CSF 4

Sequential Testing Errors

  • Always use the same nontreponemal test method (VDRL or RPR) for serial monitoring, preferably by the same laboratory 1, 2
  • VDRL and RPR titers cannot be directly compared—RPR titers are often slightly higher 1, 2

HIV-Infected Patients

  • Most HIV-infected patients have accurate and reliable serologic tests 1, 4
  • Some may have atypical results (unusually high, low, or fluctuating titers) 1, 2
  • If clinical suspicion is high despite negative serology, pursue other diagnostic procedures 3

Relying on Single Tests

  • Never diagnose neurosyphilis based on VDRL-CSF alone without considering CSF cell count and clinical context 1, 4
  • Never use treponemal test titers to assess treatment response—they remain positive for life in most patients 1, 2

Treatment Monitoring

Follow-Up CSF Examination

  • Repeat CSF examination at 6-month intervals until CSF WBC count normalizes 3
  • CSF WBC count is the most sensitive measure of treatment effectiveness 1, 4

Serologic Follow-Up

  • Repeat serum nontreponemal tests at 3,6,12, and 24 months 3
  • A fourfold decline in titer (two dilutions) indicates adequate treatment response 1, 2, 3

Treatment

Penicillin G crystalline aqueous 18-24 million units IV daily (administered as 3-4 million units every 4 hours or continuous infusion) for 10-14 days is the first-line treatment 3

  • Parenteral penicillin G is the only therapy with documented efficacy for neurosyphilis 1
  • Penicillin-allergic patients require desensitization—no alternative is proven effective 1, 3
  • Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction may occur within 24 hours of treatment initiation 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Syphilis Diagnosis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosing and Treating Neurosyphilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Seguimiento de Neurosífilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.