What is the treatment approach for a patient with a KMT2A (lysine methyltransferase 2A) mutation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Approach for KMT2A-Rearranged Leukemia

The treatment strategy for KMT2A-rearranged leukemia depends critically on three factors: whether it is ALL versus AML, the specific fusion partner involved, and the patient's age, with emerging menin inhibitors now offering targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory disease. 1

Initial Risk Stratification

Identify the Leukemia Subtype and Fusion Partner

For KMT2A-rearranged ALL:

  • In childhood (non-infant) ALL, KMT2A rearrangements account for approximately 2% of cases with a 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 59.3-69.1%, significantly worse than the 87.3% in patients without KMT2A rearrangements 1
  • The t(4;11) translocation carries the worst prognosis with only 64.8% 5-year EFS and highest relapse risk 1
  • Other common translocations include t(11;19) (20%), t(9;11) (14.3%), t(6;11) (3.8%), and t(10;11) (2.6%) 1

For KMT2A-rearranged AML:

  • Detected in 15-25% of pediatric AML patients with 5-year EFS around 45% and overall survival around 60% 1
  • High-risk fusion partners include KMT2A::AFDN, KMT2A::AFF1, KMT2A::MLLT10, KMT2A::ABI1, and KMT2A::MLLT1, which have 30.3% EFS versus 54.0% for non-high-risk partners 1
  • The high-risk cohort shows 59.7% cumulative incidence of relapse versus 35.2% for non-high-risk 1

Front-Line Treatment Strategy

For Infant ALL (Age <12 months)

Use Interfant-based chemotherapy protocols:

  • Risk-stratify based on KMT2A status, age, white blood cell count, and prednisone response at day 8 1
  • Low-risk: KMT2A germline patients 1
  • High-risk: KMT2A-rearranged with age <6 months and WBC ≥300,000/μL or poor prednisone response 1
  • Medium-risk: all other KMT2A-rearranged cases 1

After induction, assess minimal residual disease (MRD):

  • MRD-negative patients continue risk-stratified chemotherapy 1
  • MRD-positive patients require intensified consolidation 1
  • High-risk patients (age <3 months with any WBC, age <6 months with WBC ≥300,000, or persistently MRD-positive) should be considered for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) after at least 6 months of age using non-total body irradiation-based preparative regimens 1

For Childhood (Non-Infant) ALL

Enroll in clinical trials when available, otherwise:

  • Use intensive ALL chemotherapy protocols with risk stratification based on fusion partner and MRD response 1
  • The t(4;11) translocation requires the most aggressive approach given highest MRD rates and relapse risk 1
  • Consider HSCT in first complete remission for high-risk features 1

For KMT2A-Rearranged AML

Add gemtuzumab ozogamicin to conventional chemotherapy:

  • The Children's Oncology Group AAML0531 trial demonstrated improved 5-year EFS to 48% with addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate) to standard chemotherapy 1
  • This represents the first specific agent showing efficacy in KMT2A-rearranged AML 1

Risk-stratify based on fusion partner:

  • High-risk fusion partners warrant consideration for HSCT in first complete remission 1
  • Non-high-risk fusion partners may be managed with chemotherapy alone if good MRD response 1

Relapsed/Refractory Disease

Menin Inhibitor Therapy (Revumenib)

For relapsed/refractory KMT2A-rearranged leukemia, use revumenib (menin inhibitor):

  • The AUGMENT-101 trial demonstrated a combined complete response (CR) + complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate of 31.2% and overall response rate of 64.9% in relapsed/refractory KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia 1
  • In the pediatric subgroup (n=15), 10 patients responded (1 CR, 2 CRh, 2 CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 5 morphologic leukemia-free state), with 4 proceeding to HSCT 1
  • Phase 2 data showed CR+CRh rate of 22.8% with 70% achieving negative measurable residual disease 1

Dosing and administration:

  • Recommended phase 2 dose: 276 mg every 12 hours (or 160 mg/m² if body weight <40 kg) without strong CYP3A4 inhibitor 1
  • Administer continuously in 28-day cycles 1

Monitor for treatment-related adverse events:

  • Most common: nausea (27.7%), differentiation syndrome (26.6%), and QTc prolongation (23.4%) 1
  • Grade 3 or higher events occur in 25% of patients 1
  • Only 6% discontinue due to adverse events 1

Bridge to transplant:

  • 38% of responders in the overall population proceeded to HSCT 1
  • Use menin inhibitor therapy as a bridge to definitive HSCT in responding patients 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume all KMT2A rearrangements have identical prognosis:

  • The specific fusion partner dramatically impacts outcomes, with high-risk partners having 30.3% EFS versus 54.0% for non-high-risk 1
  • The t(4;11) translocation in ALL has particularly poor outcomes requiring most aggressive therapy 1

Do not delay HSCT evaluation in high-risk patients:

  • Patients with high-risk fusion partners, persistent MRD positivity, or infant ALL with poor prognostic features benefit from early HSCT consideration 1
  • For infants, wait until at least 6 months of age and use non-total body irradiation preparative regimens 1

Do not overlook lineage plasticity:

  • KMT2A-rearranged ALL frequently co-expresses myeloid markers (CD15, CD65) and can switch lineages during therapy 1
  • Monitor for lineage switches that may require treatment modification 1

Do not miss therapy-related KMT2A-rearranged leukemia:

  • Up to 70% of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms result from topoisomerase II inhibitors with 11q23 translocations 1
  • These have particularly poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival of only 28%, requiring allogeneic HSCT for curative intent 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.