What is the recommended dosing for Tenelegliptin (Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) in patients with Impaired renal function?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Teneligliptin Dosing in Renal Impairment

Teneligliptin does not require dose adjustment in patients with any degree of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis—the standard dose of 20 mg once daily can be safely administered across all stages of chronic kidney disease. 1

Standard Dosing Across All Renal Function Levels

Teneligliptin 20 mg once daily is the recommended dose regardless of eGFR, from normal renal function through end-stage renal disease. 1, 2 This represents a significant clinical advantage over most other DPP-4 inhibitors, which require dose reductions as renal function declines. 1

Pharmacokinetic Rationale

  • Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that while AUC increases in patients with renal impairment, this increase is unrelated to the degree of renal dysfunction and does not necessitate dose adjustment. 2
  • Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) remains unchanged across all stages of renal impairment following a 20 mg dose. 2
  • Plasma protein binding remains <80% in all patient groups, including those with end-stage renal disease. 2
  • Dialysis does not significantly affect teneligliptin pharmacokinetics, so no dose adjustment is needed for hemodialysis patients. 2

Clinical Evidence Supporting No Dose Adjustment

End-Stage Renal Disease Data

  • A prospective study in hemodialysis patients demonstrated that teneligliptin 20 mg once daily significantly improved glycemic control with blood glucose decreasing by 36.7 mg/dL at 4 weeks (p < 0.05). 3
  • Glycated albumin decreased by 3.1% at 28 weeks compared to controls (p < 0.05) in dialysis patients receiving standard 20 mg dosing. 3
  • No cases of hypoglycemia occurred in hemodialysis patients treated with teneligliptin 20 mg daily. 3
  • The medication was well tolerated with no treatment discontinuations due to adverse effects in the end-stage renal disease population. 3

Optimal Dosing Regimen

For maximum glycemic efficacy, teneligliptin 40 mg once daily may be considered, as it demonstrates superior HbA1c reduction compared to 20 mg without compromising safety. 4

  • The 40 mg dose showed the highest probability of achieving HbA1c <7% (SUCRA 85.81%) among all studied interventions. 4
  • Both 20 mg and 40 mg doses demonstrated acceptable safety profiles with no significant increase in hypoglycemia risk compared to placebo. 4
  • The antidiabetic effect gradually increases from 5 mg to 40 mg, with 40 mg considered the optimal dosage for efficacy while maintaining safety. 4

Comparison with Other DPP-4 Inhibitors Requiring Dose Adjustment

Teneligliptin's lack of required dose adjustment distinguishes it from most other DPP-4 inhibitors, which require significant dose reductions in renal impairment. 5, 1

Dose Adjustments Required for Alternative DPP-4 Inhibitors:

  • Sitagliptin: 50 mg daily when eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m²; 25 mg daily when eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (compared to standard 100 mg). 5, 1
  • Saxagliptin: Maximum 2.5 mg daily when eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m² (compared to standard 5 mg). 5, 1
  • Alogliptin: 12.5 mg daily when eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m²; 6.25 mg daily when eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (compared to standard 25 mg). 5, 1
  • Linagliptin: Like teneligliptin, requires no dose adjustment across all stages of renal impairment. 5, 1

Important Clinical Context and Limitations

DPP-4 inhibitors, including teneligliptin, should not be first-line therapy for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease with albuminuria. 1, 6

  • In these high-risk populations, GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors are strongly preferred due to proven cardiovascular and renal benefits. 5, 1
  • DPP-4 inhibitors have demonstrated cardiovascular safety but no cardiovascular benefit in outcome trials. 6
  • The glucose-lowering efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors is moderate (HbA1c reduction 0.4-0.9%), less potent than GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors. 6

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Assess HbA1c every 3 months to determine treatment efficacy. 1
  • Monitor renal function periodically as part of routine diabetes care, though this does not necessitate dose changes for teneligliptin. 1
  • No specific safety monitoring beyond standard diabetes care is required, as teneligliptin maintains a favorable safety profile across all stages of kidney disease. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not reduce teneligliptin dose based on declining renal function—this is unnecessary and may result in suboptimal glycemic control. 1, 2
  • Do not use teneligliptin as first-line therapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease or heart failure—these patients benefit more from SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists. 1
  • Do not assume all DPP-4 inhibitors have the same renal dosing requirements—only linagliptin and teneligliptin require no dose adjustment. 5, 1

References

Guideline

Teneligliptin Dosing Considerations in Renal Impairment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pharmacokinetics of Teneligliptin in Subjects With Renal Impairment.

Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2013

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

DPP-4 Inhibitors in Mealtime Insulin Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.