What are the implications and considerations for using BMS-986365 (CC-94676) in treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BMS-986365 (CC-94676): Clinical Results and Treatment Implications

Overview and Mechanism of Action

BMS-986365 is a first-in-class, orally bioavailable androgen receptor ligand-directed degrader (AR LDD) that operates through a dual mechanism of AR protein degradation and competitive antagonism, designed specifically for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed after androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) therapy. 1, 2, 3

The compound functions as a heterobifunctional cereblon-dependent degrader that both eliminates AR protein and blocks residual AR activity through ligand-binding domain occupancy 3. This dual mechanism distinguishes it from conventional ARPIs like enzalutamide, which can paradoxically increase AR protein levels in mCRPC models 3.

Phase I Clinical Trial Results (CC-94676-PCA-001)

Patient Population and Study Design

The phase I study (NCT04428788) enrolled heavily pretreated patients with progressive mCRPC who had received:

  • Androgen deprivation therapy
  • One or more prior ARPIs
  • Taxane chemotherapy (unless declined or ineligible)
  • Median of 4 prior therapies (range 2-11) in the expansion cohort 2

The study included dose escalation (Part A, n=27) and expansion (Part B, n=68) phases, testing doses up to 900 mg twice daily 2.

Efficacy Outcomes

At the three highest doses (400-900 mg twice daily, n=60), BMS-986365 demonstrated clinically meaningful activity with a PSA50 response rate of 32% overall and 50% at the 900 mg dose. 2

Key efficacy findings:

  • Median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS): 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.3-12.6 months) across all high doses 2
  • rPFS at 900 mg dose: 8.3 months (95% CI: 3.8-16.6 months) 2
  • Chemotherapy-naive patients: Median rPFS of 16.5 months (95% CI: 5.5 months-not evaluable) 2
  • Prior chemotherapy patients: Median rPFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.7-8.3 months) 2

Notably, efficacy was observed regardless of AR ligand-binding domain mutation status, including patients with wildtype AR and those with clinically relevant AR mutations 2, 3.

Safety Profile

BMS-986365 demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no maximum tolerated dose reached in dose escalation. 2

Most common treatment-related adverse events:

  • Asymptomatic QTc prolongation: 47% of patients 2
  • Bradycardia: 34% of patients 2
  • Both events were generally asymptomatic and manageable 2

The compound was well tolerated overall, with adverse events predominantly mild to moderate in intensity 2.

Preclinical Mechanistic Data

BMS-986365 demonstrated superior activity compared to enzalutamide in preclinical models:

  • More efficient inhibition of AR target gene transcription 3
  • Greater suppression of AR-dependent cell proliferation 3
  • Maintained low AR protein levels despite increased AR transcript levels, while enzalutamide increased AR protein 3
  • Demonstrated activity in both castration-sensitive and therapy-resistant CRPC models 3

Ongoing Phase III Trial (rechARge)

A phase III randomized trial (NCT06764485) is currently enrolling approximately 960 patients with mCRPC whose disease progressed after one prior ARPI. 1

Trial design:

  • Comparator arm: Investigator's choice of either docetaxel or switch to alternative ARPI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) 1
  • Primary objectives: Compare efficacy and safety of BMS-986365 versus investigator's choice 1
  • Target population: Patients with disease progression after one prior ARPI 1

Clinical Implications and Treatment Positioning

Key Advantages Over Current ARPIs

  1. Overcomes ARPI resistance mechanisms: The dual degradation-antagonism mechanism addresses continued AR-driven disease despite ARPI therapy 2, 3

  2. Mutation-agnostic activity: Effective against both wildtype AR and most clinically relevant AR mutations, eliminating the need for mutation testing to guide therapy 2, 3

  3. Particularly promising in chemotherapy-naive patients: The 16.5-month median rPFS in chemotherapy-naive patients suggests optimal positioning before taxane therapy 2

Optimal Patient Selection

BMS-986365 should be prioritized for patients with mCRPC who have progressed on one ARPI, particularly those who are chemotherapy-naive, given the substantially longer rPFS observed in this subgroup (16.5 vs 5.5 months). 2

Consider BMS-986365 for:

  • Post-ARPI progression with continued AR-driven disease 2
  • Patients with or without AR mutations 2, 3
  • Chemotherapy-naive patients as preferred population 2
  • Patients who can tolerate mild cardiac monitoring requirements (QTc, heart rate) 2

Critical Monitoring Requirements

Implement cardiac monitoring for QTc prolongation and bradycardia, though these events are typically asymptomatic and manageable. 2

Required monitoring:

  • Baseline and periodic ECG monitoring for QTc interval 2
  • Heart rate assessment for bradycardia 2
  • Standard prostate cancer monitoring (PSA, imaging) 2

Dose Considerations

The 900 mg twice daily dose demonstrated the highest response rates (50% PSA50) and longest rPFS (8.3 months), though the recommended phase II dose selection remains ongoing. 2

Comparison to Standard Post-ARPI Options

Unlike switching to an alternative ARPI (which may have limited benefit due to cross-resistance) or proceeding directly to chemotherapy, BMS-986365 offers a mechanistically distinct approach that maintains AR targeting while overcoming resistance mechanisms 1, 2, 3. The phase III trial will definitively establish its position relative to these standard options 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.