What is the treatment for acral lentiginous melanoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma

Surgical excision with histologically negative margins is the primary and first-line treatment for acral lentiginous melanoma, with margins of 0.5 cm for in situ disease, 1 cm for tumors ≤2 mm Breslow thickness, and 2 cm for thicker tumors, though functional preservation at acral sites often necessitates narrower margins. 1, 2

Surgical Management of Primary Disease

Excision Margins

  • For melanoma in situ: Wide excision with 0.5-1.0 cm margins is recommended 1, 2
  • For invasive melanoma ≤2 mm thickness: 1 cm margins 1, 2
  • For invasive melanoma >2 mm thickness: 2 cm margins 1, 2
  • Critical caveat: Acral sites (palms, soles, subungual areas) frequently require narrower margins to preserve function, though sub-1 cm margins for invasive melanomas at anatomically constrained acral sites are generally not recommended until further studies are available 1
  • Depth of excision should extend to (but not including) the fascia 1

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

  • Indicated for: Melanomas with Breslow thickness >1 mm, or >0.75 mm with high-risk features (ulceration, elevated mitotic rate) 1, 2
  • Should be performed before wide excision, ideally in the same operative setting 1
  • Important consideration: ALM is more likely to present with thicker tumors, ulceration, and lymph node positivity compared to non-acral melanomas, making SLNB particularly relevant 3

Complete Lymph Node Dissection

  • Therapeutic lymph node dissection of the entire regional basin is required when sentinel nodes are positive or when there are clinically evident regional metastases 4, 2
  • The goal is R0 resection; incomplete resection negates survival benefit 4

Adjuvant Therapy After Complete Resection (Stage III)

First-Line Adjuvant Options

  • Anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) is the preferred first-line adjuvant option after complete surgical resection of stage III disease 4
  • Combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab is considered for high-risk features, though it carries significantly higher toxicity including severe colitis and endocrinopathies 1, 4
  • BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination is reserved for BRAF-mutated disease requiring rapid disease control 4

Molecular Testing Requirements

  • Mandatory: BRAF mutation testing in all patients with stage III/IV disease 4
  • If BRAF-negative, test for NRAS and c-KIT mutations, as ALM has a distinct molecular profile with higher frequency of KIT mutations compared to non-acral melanomas 2

Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

  • Consider adjuvant radiation after resection of bulky disease, when R1 resection cannot be re-excised, or after lymph node dissection in high-risk situations (multiple bulky lymph node metastases) 1, 4
  • Postoperative irradiation reduces locoregional relapse risk by approximately 50% but does not impact overall survival 1

Treatment of Locoregional Disease

In-Transit Metastases

  • Resectable disease: Surgical removal including the surrounding lymph node region 1
  • Unresectable in-transit metastases of the limbs without distant metastases: Isolated limb perfusion using melphalan and/or tumor necrosis factor-α 1, 2
  • Alternative approaches: Electrochemotherapy or intralesional therapy with T-Vec (talimogene laherparepvec) 1

Treatment of Metastatic Disease (Stage IV)

Systemic Therapy Selection

For BRAF Wild-Type Disease:

  • First-line: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) 4
  • For symptomatic, bulky, or rapidly progressive disease: Combination ipilimumab/nivolumab 4
  • Important caveat: ALM has a suppressed immune environment and lower tumor mutational burden compared to non-acral melanomas, which may limit response to immunotherapy 5, 6

For BRAF-Mutated Disease:

  • First-line: BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination therapy 4
  • Alternative: Combination ipilimumab/nivolumab has shown particular benefit for BRAF-mutant acral melanoma 5

Novel Therapies

  • Adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (ACT-TIL) has demonstrated a 43% objective response rate in metastatic acral melanoma, comparable to non-acral melanoma despite lower tumor mutational burden 6
  • Enrollment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged given the rarity and unique biology of ALM 1, 2

Palliative Chemotherapy

  • For advanced disease with multiple metastases, well-tolerated cytostatics such as dacarbazine, taxanes, or fotemustine may be used 2
  • Palliative radiation achieves 49-77% overall response rates for symptomatic metastases 4

Surveillance and Monitoring

Staging Workup Before Aggressive Treatment

  • Mandatory imaging: CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and/or PET scan to exclude distant metastases before undertaking aggressive local surgical treatments 1, 4
  • Brain MRI: Essential given melanoma's propensity for CNS metastases 4

Follow-Up During Treatment

  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis every 2-3 months initially to assess response 4
  • Brain MRI at baseline and during follow-up 4
  • Close monitoring for immune-related adverse events with immunotherapy 4

Critical Prognostic Considerations

  • Stage-specific survival: ALM has worse survival compared to non-ALM melanomas when stratified by stage, most notably in stage III patients (5-year survival 47.5% vs 56.7%) 3
  • Adverse prognostic factors: Older age, male sex, higher comorbidity burden, increased tumor thickness, ulceration, positive lymph nodes, and positive margins independently predict lower survival 3
  • Multimodality therapy (surgery plus systemic therapy and/or radiation) is associated with higher survival in stage III patients 3
  • Diagnostic delay: ALM frequently presents at more advanced stages due to diagnostic difficulty and delays, contributing to worse outcomes 3, 7, 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Tratamiento del Melanoma Acral

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma to Parotid Gland and Lymph Nodes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Adoptive Cell Transfer of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Metastatic Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025

Research

Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.

Cancer treatment and research, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.