Treatment of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma
Surgical excision with histologically negative margins is the primary and first-line treatment for acral lentiginous melanoma, with margins of 0.5 cm for in situ disease, 1 cm for tumors ≤2 mm Breslow thickness, and 2 cm for thicker tumors, though functional preservation at acral sites often necessitates narrower margins. 1, 2
Surgical Management of Primary Disease
Excision Margins
- For melanoma in situ: Wide excision with 0.5-1.0 cm margins is recommended 1, 2
- For invasive melanoma ≤2 mm thickness: 1 cm margins 1, 2
- For invasive melanoma >2 mm thickness: 2 cm margins 1, 2
- Critical caveat: Acral sites (palms, soles, subungual areas) frequently require narrower margins to preserve function, though sub-1 cm margins for invasive melanomas at anatomically constrained acral sites are generally not recommended until further studies are available 1
- Depth of excision should extend to (but not including) the fascia 1
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Indicated for: Melanomas with Breslow thickness >1 mm, or >0.75 mm with high-risk features (ulceration, elevated mitotic rate) 1, 2
- Should be performed before wide excision, ideally in the same operative setting 1
- Important consideration: ALM is more likely to present with thicker tumors, ulceration, and lymph node positivity compared to non-acral melanomas, making SLNB particularly relevant 3
Complete Lymph Node Dissection
- Therapeutic lymph node dissection of the entire regional basin is required when sentinel nodes are positive or when there are clinically evident regional metastases 4, 2
- The goal is R0 resection; incomplete resection negates survival benefit 4
Adjuvant Therapy After Complete Resection (Stage III)
First-Line Adjuvant Options
- Anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) is the preferred first-line adjuvant option after complete surgical resection of stage III disease 4
- Combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab is considered for high-risk features, though it carries significantly higher toxicity including severe colitis and endocrinopathies 1, 4
- BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination is reserved for BRAF-mutated disease requiring rapid disease control 4
Molecular Testing Requirements
- Mandatory: BRAF mutation testing in all patients with stage III/IV disease 4
- If BRAF-negative, test for NRAS and c-KIT mutations, as ALM has a distinct molecular profile with higher frequency of KIT mutations compared to non-acral melanomas 2
Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
- Consider adjuvant radiation after resection of bulky disease, when R1 resection cannot be re-excised, or after lymph node dissection in high-risk situations (multiple bulky lymph node metastases) 1, 4
- Postoperative irradiation reduces locoregional relapse risk by approximately 50% but does not impact overall survival 1
Treatment of Locoregional Disease
In-Transit Metastases
- Resectable disease: Surgical removal including the surrounding lymph node region 1
- Unresectable in-transit metastases of the limbs without distant metastases: Isolated limb perfusion using melphalan and/or tumor necrosis factor-α 1, 2
- Alternative approaches: Electrochemotherapy or intralesional therapy with T-Vec (talimogene laherparepvec) 1
Treatment of Metastatic Disease (Stage IV)
Systemic Therapy Selection
For BRAF Wild-Type Disease:
- First-line: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) 4
- For symptomatic, bulky, or rapidly progressive disease: Combination ipilimumab/nivolumab 4
- Important caveat: ALM has a suppressed immune environment and lower tumor mutational burden compared to non-acral melanomas, which may limit response to immunotherapy 5, 6
For BRAF-Mutated Disease:
- First-line: BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination therapy 4
- Alternative: Combination ipilimumab/nivolumab has shown particular benefit for BRAF-mutant acral melanoma 5
Novel Therapies
- Adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (ACT-TIL) has demonstrated a 43% objective response rate in metastatic acral melanoma, comparable to non-acral melanoma despite lower tumor mutational burden 6
- Enrollment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged given the rarity and unique biology of ALM 1, 2
Palliative Chemotherapy
- For advanced disease with multiple metastases, well-tolerated cytostatics such as dacarbazine, taxanes, or fotemustine may be used 2
- Palliative radiation achieves 49-77% overall response rates for symptomatic metastases 4
Surveillance and Monitoring
Staging Workup Before Aggressive Treatment
- Mandatory imaging: CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and/or PET scan to exclude distant metastases before undertaking aggressive local surgical treatments 1, 4
- Brain MRI: Essential given melanoma's propensity for CNS metastases 4
Follow-Up During Treatment
- CT chest/abdomen/pelvis every 2-3 months initially to assess response 4
- Brain MRI at baseline and during follow-up 4
- Close monitoring for immune-related adverse events with immunotherapy 4
Critical Prognostic Considerations
- Stage-specific survival: ALM has worse survival compared to non-ALM melanomas when stratified by stage, most notably in stage III patients (5-year survival 47.5% vs 56.7%) 3
- Adverse prognostic factors: Older age, male sex, higher comorbidity burden, increased tumor thickness, ulceration, positive lymph nodes, and positive margins independently predict lower survival 3
- Multimodality therapy (surgery plus systemic therapy and/or radiation) is associated with higher survival in stage III patients 3
- Diagnostic delay: ALM frequently presents at more advanced stages due to diagnostic difficulty and delays, contributing to worse outcomes 3, 7, 8