Treatment of Olecranon Bursitis in an Elderly Patient with End-Stage Renal Disease
Initial conservative management with aspiration, compression, NSAIDs (with extreme caution given ESRD), and rest should be the first-line approach, avoiding corticosteroid injections and reserving surgery only for refractory cases that fail 4-6 weeks of conservative therapy. 1, 2
Initial Assessment and Differentiation
The critical first step is distinguishing septic from aseptic bursitis, as this fundamentally alters management:
Clinical indicators suggesting septic bursitis:
- Fever >37.8°C 3
- Prebursal temperature difference >2.2°C compared to contralateral side 3
- Presence of skin lesions or breaks in skin integrity 3
- Purulent aspirate on bursal fluid analysis 3
Bursal aspirate analysis should include:
- White cell count (>3,000 cells/μL suggests septic) 3
- Polymorphonuclear cells (>50% suggests septic) 3
- Fluid-to-serum glucose ratio (<50% suggests septic) 3
- Gram staining and culture 3
Conservative Management (First-Line for Both Septic and Aseptic)
For aseptic bursitis, the evidence strongly favors conservative management over invasive interventions:
- Bursal aspiration is safe and does not increase infection risk in aseptic cases 2
- Compression and immobilization with elbow orthosis 1, 4
- Rest and ice (PRICE protocol) 3
- NSAIDs with extreme caution: In ESRD patients, traditional NSAIDs are contraindicated due to further renal injury risk and accumulation of metabolites. If pain control is needed, consider acetaminophen at reduced doses or topical NSAIDs 1
For septic bursitis:
- Bursal aspiration for drainage 3, 2
- Antibiotic therapy based on culture results (adjust dosing for ESRD) 3
- Conservative measures as above 3
What to Avoid
Corticosteroid injections should be avoided entirely in this patient:
- Intrabursal corticosteroid injection is associated with significantly increased overall complications (p=0.0458) and skin atrophy (p=0.0261) without improving outcomes 2
- Recent literature demonstrates adverse effects compared to noninvasive management 1
- In ESRD patients, the risk-benefit ratio is even more unfavorable given impaired wound healing and infection risk
Surgical Management (Reserved for Refractory Cases Only)
Surgery should be restricted to severe, refractory, or chronic/recurrent cases that fail 4-6 weeks of conservative therapy:
- Surgical management (bursectomy) is significantly less effective than conservative management for both septic and aseptic bursitis (p=0.0476) 2
- Surgery demonstrates higher rates of overall complications (p=0.0117), persistent drainage (p=0.0194), and bursal infection (p=0.0060) 2
- The immediate bursectomy approach for septic bursitis is not supported by evidence 3
In elderly ESRD patients, surgical risks are amplified:
- Impaired wound healing 5
- Higher perioperative complication rates 5
- Life expectancy and functional status should guide aggressive intervention decisions 5
Special Considerations for ESRD Patients
Medication adjustments are critical:
- Avoid nephrotoxic NSAIDs entirely 6
- Adjust antibiotic dosing for renal clearance if septic bursitis is present 6
- Monitor for hyperkalemia if any systemic medications are used 6
The condition is often self-limited:
- Olecranon bursitis frequently resolves with conservative methods alone 1
- Patience with conservative therapy (4-6 weeks minimum) is warranted before considering escalation 4, 3
Clinical Pitfall
The most common error is premature escalation to corticosteroid injection or surgery. Aseptic bursitis paradoxically has a higher overall complication rate than septic bursitis (p=0.0108), likely due to inappropriate aggressive interventions 2. In elderly ESRD patients, the stakes are even higher—maintain conservative management unless there is clear failure after adequate trial duration.