What are the differences between neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils in terms of elevation in viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections?

White Blood Cell Differential in Infections

Neutrophils

Neutrophils are the hallmark of bacterial infections, with the most powerful diagnostic marker being an absolute band count ≥1,500 cells/mm³ (likelihood ratio 14.5 for bacterial infection). 1

Bacterial Infections

• Total white blood cell count and neutrophil count are often increased with invasive bacterial pathogens, including respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, skin/soft tissue infections, and gastrointestinal infections 2, 1
• Neutrophil percentage >90% has a likelihood ratio of 7.5 for bacterial infection 1
• Left shift (≥16% band neutrophils) has a likelihood ratio of 4.7 for bacterial infection, even when total WBC count is normal 1
• Total WBC ≥14,000 cells/mm³ has a likelihood ratio of 3.7 for bacterial infection 1
• Specific bacterial pathogens commonly causing neutrophilia include Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia 2, 3
• Monocyte predominance may suggest intracellular pathogens such as Salmonella 2

Viral Infections

• A white blood cell count within normal range for age with lymphocytic predominance typically occurs with viral etiologies 2
• Mildly elevated neutrophil counts can occur in viral respiratory infections and do not necessarily indicate bacterial superinfection when accompanied by mild cold symptoms without fever 4
• Neutrophils do participate in antiviral immunity through virus internalization, cytokine release, and NET formation, though their role is less prominent than in bacterial infections 5

Key Diagnostic Thresholds

• Perform complete blood count with manual differential (preferred over automated) to assess bands and immature forms 1
• In the absence of fever, leukocytosis >14,000 cells/mm³, left shift ≥16% bands, or focal infection signs, additional diagnostic testing may not be indicated 1
• Do not treat patients with antibiotics based solely on mildly elevated neutrophil counts without other clinical evidence of bacterial infection 4

---

Eosinophils

Eosinophils are characteristically elevated in parasitic infections that involve a tissue phase, not in typical bacterial or viral infections. 2

Parasitic Infections

• An increased eosinophil count occurs with parasitic infections involving tissue invasion, including helminths 2, 6
• Eosinophils participate prominently in immune responses against parasites through release of cationic proteins and cytotoxic basic proteins 6, 7

Allergic Conditions

• Eosinophils are the principal cells in allergic processes and asthma, along with neutrophils and macrophages in acute inflammation 6
• Large numbers of eosinophils indicate Th2-related inflammation 7

Viral Infections

• Eosinopenia (decreased eosinophils) is an indicator of severity in COVID-19, while increased eosinophil count is associated with better prognosis 7
• Eosinophils can release antiviral molecules including RNases and reactive oxygen species, though this is not their primary role 7

Bacterial Infections

• Eosinophils are not typically elevated in routine bacterial infections 2
• Emerging evidence suggests eosinophils may promote Th17 responses during Bordetella bronchiseptica respiratory infection, but this is not a general pattern 8

---

Basophils

Basophils are not routinely elevated in bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections and are not clinically useful markers for infection diagnosis. 6

Clinical Role

• Large numbers of basophils are observed in certain delayed chronic inflammatory processes, but their role in lung pathology and infection is uncertain 6
• Basophils serve as repositories for mediators causing increased vascular permeability but are not primary responders to infections 6

---

Clinical Algorithm for Infection Differentiation

Step 1: Assess Total WBC and Neutrophil Parameters

• If absolute band count ≥1,500 cells/mm³: Highest likelihood of bacterial infection (LR 14.5) 1
• If neutrophil percentage >90%: Strong indicator of bacterial infection (LR 7.5) 1
• If left shift ≥16% bands: Moderate indicator of bacterial infection (LR 4.7) 1
• If total WBC ≥14,000 cells/mm³: Moderate indicator of bacterial infection (LR 3.7) 1

Step 2: Assess Lymphocyte Predominance

• If WBC normal with lymphocytic predominance: Consider viral etiology 2
• Mildly elevated neutrophils with cold symptoms and no fever do not warrant antibiotics 4

Step 3: Assess Eosinophil Count

• If eosinophilia present: Evaluate for parasitic infection with tissue phase or allergic condition 2
• Eosinophils are not elevated in routine bacterial or viral infections 2

Step 4: Consider Clinical Context

• Fever, purulent discharge, focal findings, and symptom duration >7-10 days favor bacterial infection 4
• Myalgia, pharyngitis resolving by day 5 with persistent nasal congestion favor viral infection 2

---

Common Pitfalls

• Do not overlook absolute neutrophil count elevation when total WBC is only mildly elevated—left shift can indicate bacterial infection even with normal total WBC 1
• Do not treat asymptomatic patients or those with mild viral symptoms with antibiotics based solely on mildly elevated neutrophils 4
• Do not ignore band count—absolute band count ≥1,500 cells/mm³ is the single most powerful predictor of bacterial infection 1
• Do not rely on automated differentials alone—manual differential is preferred to accurately assess bands and immature forms 1
• Neutrophil counts fluctuate with stress, exercise, and minor inflammation; interpret in full clinical context 4