How should dentists handle patients with anti-science beliefs?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Handling Patients with Anti-Science Beliefs in Dental Practice

Dentists should use patient-centered communication that validates concerns while providing evidence-based education through shared decision-making, rather than dismissing or confronting anti-science beliefs directly.

Core Communication Strategy

The most effective approach centers on shared decision-making that respects patient autonomy while maintaining evidence-based standards. This framework has been specifically validated in dental contexts where patient expectations significantly influence treatment decisions 1.

Build Trust Through Validation and Active Listening

  • Listen to and validate patient concerns without attempting to immediately dispel their beliefs 1. Instead of confronting anti-science views directly, ask patients in a nonjudgmental manner about their fears or concerns regarding diagnosis and treatment 1.

  • Use empathy and relationship-building as foundational tools, as these directly address the perceived risks patients associate with dental care 2. Trust-building through communication and understanding patients' lifestyle and social determinants is essential 3.

  • Communicate verbally and non-verbally in a respectful and culturally appropriate manner 1. Providers must show empathy, encourage questions and feedback, and give ample time to patients 4.

Implement Structured Patient Education

Use Multimodal Presentation Techniques

  • Employ visual aids, figures, and plain language to maximize patient understanding 5. Communication should be clear (easy to understand), correct (accurate), concise (to the point), complete (with essential information), and cohesive (well-organized) 4.

  • Implement an iterative educational process: assess understanding, identify misunderstandings, provide corrective feedback, and summarize information 5.

Frame Discussions Around Morbidity and Mortality

  • Discuss the morbidity and mortality associated with treatment decisions to frame conversations appropriately 1. For example, when addressing antibiotic prophylaxis concerns, dentists should educate patients about adverse drug reactions including Clostridioides difficile infection, which can require emergency room visits or hospitalization 1.

  • Provide consistent messaging that decreases defensive medicine practices while empowering patients with knowledge required to make informed decisions 1, 4.

Apply Shared Decision-Making Framework

Structure the Decision Process

  • Use patient education tools that provide consistent messaging and allow shared decision-making 1. This approach has been specifically recommended to decrease defensive prescribing when patients have misconceptions about treatment necessity.

  • Ask patients to explain how they weighed risks and benefits to reach their decision, which tests their reasoning ability while engaging them in the process 5.

  • Document the shared decision-making process thoroughly, including the patient's understanding, concerns addressed, and the final treatment plan agreed upon 5.

Address Specific Anti-Science Scenarios

When Patients Refuse Evidence-Based Treatment

  • If a patient makes an "informed refusal" of information, respect the request 1. Subsequent information about the patient's condition should be delivered in a culturally relevant and appropriate manner as indicated by the patient 1.

  • Recognize that patients may trust in prayer, spiritual healers, and advice from family and friends 1. Rather than dismissing these beliefs, acknowledge them while providing medical information 1.

When Beliefs Conflict with Standard Care

  • Avoid simply asking patients to comply with recommendations, as this approach does not work 1. Instead, address the relational dynamics centered on risks and the desire to reassign risks elsewhere 1.

  • Use simple, succinct language and proper body language when interacting with patients 4. Show understanding that patients' expectations influence treatment decisions 1.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Adopt a Paternalistic Approach

  • Global distrust of dominating dentists must give way to person-centered professional strategies 2. Patient-centered care, as opposed to dentist-centered care, empowers patients and practices active listening 2.

  • Avoid implicit bias that patients will be less compliant with complex treatment regimens, as this stereotype can lead to differential patient recommendations 1.

Do Not Rush the Process

  • Give ample time to patients for discussion and questions 4. Effective communication not only improves efficiency but also alleviates dental anxiety and fear, addresses needs and preferences, and increases adherence 4.

  • Recognize that trust development requires time and follows a transformational model from deterrence-based to knowledge-based to identification-based trust 6.

Document and Reassess

  • Document capacity assessments and decision-making discussions thoroughly, including specific examples of the patient's understanding, clinical reasoning for treatment recommendations, and plans for reassessment 5.

  • Reassess understanding and capacity when the patient's condition changes or when making different treatment decisions 5. Recognize that understanding can fluctuate, particularly during acute stress or illness 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Evaluating Trust in the Patient-Dentist Relationship: A Mixed-Method Study.

JDR clinical and translational research, 2023

Guideline

Decision-Making Capacity in Dental Care for Patients with Disabilities

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.