What is the usual duration before the first dressing change and management protocol for the bolter (bolster) dressing technique on skin grafts?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bolster Dressing Technique on Skin Grafts: Duration and Practice Variations

Direct Answer

The first dressing change for traditional tie-over bolster dressings on skin grafts is typically performed between postoperative days 5 and 7, though negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may allow for earlier removal at 72 hours with equivalent or superior outcomes. 1, 2

Duration Before First Dressing Change

Traditional Tie-Over Bolster Dressing

  • Standard timing: 5-7 days postoperatively before the first dressing change and graft assessment 1
  • This duration allows adequate time for graft adherence and neovascularization to occur
  • The bolster maintains constant pressure to prevent fluid accumulation and graft displacement during this critical period 1

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Alternative

  • NPWT can be discontinued as early as 72 hours (3 days) with good graft adherence and survival 2
  • This represents a significant reduction in immobilization time compared to traditional bolster dressings
  • Earlier removal is possible due to the continuous evacuation of fluid and uniform pressure distribution 3

Variations in Practice Between Specialties and Centers

Technical Variations

Small grafts (< 45mm diameter):

  • Some dermatologic surgery centers omit tie-over bolster dressings entirely for small full-thickness skin grafts on the face, scalp, ear, and finger 4
  • These centers use only interrupted perimeter sutures with antibiotic ointment and light or no dressing, achieving 100% graft take despite early superficial necrosis in some cases 4
  • This approach saves time and material while minimizing graft handling 4

Complex anatomical sites:

  • For irregular, high-mobility areas (dorsum of hand, penile shaft, scrotum), practice varies significantly between traditional bolster and NPWT 1, 3, 2
  • Intraoral defects may utilize specialized techniques like the "parachute" bolster method as an alternative to standard tie-over techniques 5

Efficacy Differences by Method

NPWT demonstrates superior outcomes in challenging locations:

  • Graft take rate: 97.2% with NPWT versus 90.2% with tie-over bolster dressing overall 1
  • In irregular, high-mobility areas specifically: 97.6% versus 81.7% take rate 1
  • NPWT achieves 95% or higher survival rates at difficult sites with complicated curved surfaces 3
  • Significantly reduced graft displacement: 1 patient with NPWT versus 9 patients with traditional bolster 1

Application time efficiency:

  • NPWT requires 15.2 ± 4.2 minutes for dressing application 1
  • Traditional tie-over bolster requires 27.4 ± 4.3 minutes 1

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

With traditional tie-over bolster dressings:

  • Inadequate tension and pressure can produce hematoma, dislocation, or wrinkles in the graft 3
  • Particularly problematic on complicatedly curved surfaces requiring surgical skill and experience 3
  • Sites with mixed bone support (e.g., dorsum of hand) require delicate pressure variations that are difficult to achieve with bolsters 3

Key advantage of NPWT:

  • Applies uniform negative pressure to remove hematomas and pull the entire graft onto the recipient site with consistent force 3
  • Can be applied circumferentially to complex anatomy (e.g., penis) without perfusion monitoring concerns or risk of avascular necrosis 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.