Is fosfomycin (phosphonic acid antibiotic) effective against Proteus mirabilis, including Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fosfomycin Coverage of ESBL-Producing Proteus mirabilis

Fosfomycin demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-producing Proteus mirabilis and is an appropriate treatment option, but ONLY for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (cystitis) in women—it should NOT be used for complicated UTIs, pyelonephritis, or any systemic infections. 1, 2

In Vitro Activity and Microbiological Evidence

  • Fosfomycin shows robust activity against Proteus mirabilis, including ESBL-producing strains, with the FDA label specifically listing P. mirabilis as a susceptible organism 3
  • A 2017 in vitro study demonstrated that fosfomycin inhibited 100% of ESBL-positive P. mirabilis strains isolated from urine using standardized susceptibility testing methods 4
  • The bactericidal mechanism involves irreversible inhibition of enolpyruvyl transferase, blocking bacterial cell wall synthesis, with no cross-resistance to beta-lactams or aminoglycosides 3

Critical Clinical Limitations

The European Association of Urology restricts fosfomycin to uncomplicated cystitis ONLY, explicitly excluding complicated UTIs and pyelonephritis regardless of the pathogen 1, 5. This is a crucial distinction that must guide clinical decision-making.

When Fosfomycin IS Appropriate:

  • Uncomplicated cystitis in women caused by ESBL-producing P. mirabilis: single 3-gram oral dose 1, 2
  • Achieves therapeutic urinary concentrations of 706 mcg/mL within 2-4 hours, maintaining levels >100 mcg/mL for 26 hours 3
  • Can be taken without regard to food 3

When Fosfomycin is NOT Appropriate:

  • Complicated UTIs or pyelonephritis: carbapenems (ertapenem) are preferred 1
  • Systemic ESBL infections: carbapenems remain first-line, with alternatives including ceftazidime/avibactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam 1
  • Bacteremic patients: fosfomycin has poor plasma concentrations and should be avoided 6

Important Caveats

Tigecycline lacks in vitro activity against Proteus species (along with other Enterobacteriaceae like Serratia and Morganella), making fosfomycin a superior choice for uncomplicated P. mirabilis cystitis when other agents are contraindicated 6, 2

Resistance is emerging: While historical data showed excellent susceptibility, fosfomycin resistance among ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae is increasing over time, though specific P. mirabilis resistance rates remain favorable 7

Treatment Algorithm for ESBL-Producing P. mirabilis

  1. Uncomplicated cystitis in women: Fosfomycin 3g oral single dose 1, 2
  2. Complicated UTI or pyelonephritis: Ertapenem or other carbapenem 1
  3. Systemic/severe infection: Carbapenem first-line; consider ceftazidime/avibactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam if carbapenem-sparing needed 1
  4. Intra-abdominal infection with ESBL P. mirabilis: Ceftolozane/tazobactam with metronidazole or carbapenem 6

The key pitfall to avoid: Do not extrapolate fosfomycin's excellent in vitro activity against P. mirabilis to clinical scenarios beyond uncomplicated cystitis—the evidence and guidelines uniformly restrict its use to this narrow indication despite microbiological susceptibility 1, 5.

References

Guideline

Fosfomycin Use in Treating ESBL-Producing Organisms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fosfomycin Treatment for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fosfomycin for UTI with Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Rods

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.